MHB Rearranging Formulas: Finding W in Terms of M and L

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samwise-zambeezi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around rearranging the formula M = (((W x L / 2) x (L / 2)) - ((W x L / 2) x (L / 4))) to solve for W. Participants suggest multiplying the entire equation by 4 to simplify it, leading to the expression Mx4 = ((WLx2) x (Lx2)) - ((WLx2) x L). After factoring out W and simplifying the fractions, the final rearranged formula is W = 8M / L^2. The conversation highlights common confusions in algebraic manipulation and the importance of clear notation. The problem is resolved with a correct formula for W.
Samwise-zambeezi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a formula which I need to rearrange but it's been a while since I covered this at school, I've tried to read up and re-study but I keep getting confused about what I can/can't do to the various brackets.

The formula is:

M = (((W x L / 2) x (L / 2)) - ((W x L / 2) x (L / 4)))

I'm trying to rearrange in terms of W, so W = ...

Any help or advance anyone could offer would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi! Can you start by multiplying each term in this by 4? What do you get if you do that?

Is this the starting formula by the way?

$$M = \left( \frac{W \times L}{2} \times \frac{L}{2} \right) - \left( \frac{W \times L}{2} \times \frac{L}{4} \right)$$
 
Hi Jameson, Happy New Year and thanks very much for getting back to me!

So, the equation definitely looks better in that format (i was using microsoft excel before). I'll try to mutiply both terms by 4 below (Sorry, I'm not used to using proper math input formatting)...

\[ M=(\frac{W x L}{2}) x (\frac{L}{2}) - (\frac{W x L}{2}) x (\frac{L}{4}) \]

\[ Mx4=(\frac{W x L}{2}) x (\frac{L}{2}) x 4 - (\frac{W x L}{2}) x (\frac{L}{4})x 4 \]

\[ Mx4=(({W x Lx2}) x (Lx2)) - ({W x Lx2}) x L \]

Then, if that's right?... could i divide everything by 'L'?

\[ (\frac{Mx4}{L})=(({W x Lx2}) x L) - ({W x Lx2}) \]

I'm not really sure about that, or if it's right, where to go from here. Think I'm getting confused about which parts of the term i should apply the 'action' to (ie. both sides of the '-', or both sides of the 'x' on both sides of the '-')

Sorry, hard to explain in writing but really appreciate your help
 
Samwise-zambeezi said:
Hi Jameson, Happy New Year and thanks very much for getting back to me!

So, the equation definitely looks better in that format (i was using microsoft excel before). I'll try to mutiply both terms by 4 below (Sorry, I'm not used to using proper math input formatting)...

\[ M=(\frac{W x L}{2}) x (\frac{L}{2}) - (\frac{W x L}{2}) x (\frac{L}{4}) \]

\[ Mx4=(\frac{W x L}{2}) x (\frac{L}{2}) x 4 - (\frac{W x L}{2}) x (\frac{L}{4})x 4 \]

\[ Mx4=(({W x Lx2}) x (Lx2)) - ({W x Lx2}) x L \]

Then, if that's right?... could i divide everything by 'L'?

\[ (\frac{Mx4}{L})=(({W x Lx2}) x L) - ({W x Lx2}) \]

I'm not really sure about that, or if it's right, where to go from here. Think I'm getting confused about which parts of the term i should apply the 'action' to (ie. both sides of the '-', or both sides of the 'x' on both sides of the '-')

Sorry, hard to explain in writing but really appreciate your help
Please don't use "x" for times. It can get very confusing. Either just write WL or W*L or [math]W ]cdot L[/math].

[math]M = \left ( \dfrac{WL}{2} ~ \dfrac{L}{2} \right ) - \left ( \dfrac{WL}{2} ~ \dfrac{L}{4} \right )[/math]

[math]M = \dfrac{WL^2}{4} - \dfrac{WL^2}{8}[/math]

Factor the common W:
[math]M = W \left ( \dfrac{L^2}{4} - \dfrac{L^2}{8} \right )[/math]

Can you subtract the fractions?

-Dan
 
Aaah, think I've got it!

So:

\[ M = W (\frac{L^2}{4}−\frac{L^2}{8}) \]

\[ M = W (\frac{L^2}{8}) \]

\[ M / (\frac{L^2}{8}) = W \]Is that right? Looks right, thanks so much guys!
 
Otherwise known as [math]W = \dfrac{8M}{L^2}[/math].

Good job!

-Dan
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top