Rearranging Series to Equal SQRT2: How to Solve

  • Thread starter Thread starter andrey21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on rearranging the series defined by the formula ((-1)^(n-1))/(n) to equal SQRT(2). Participants suggest a systematic approach of alternating between positive and negative terms to achieve the desired sum. Additionally, they explore various series, including 1/4 + 1/10 + 1/18 + 1/28 + ..., and derive a general term for this sequence. The limit of the series is determined to be 11/18, and the convergence of other series is discussed, including geometric series and their sums.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series and convergence concepts
  • Familiarity with partial fractions and telescoping series
  • Knowledge of limits and algebraic manipulation
  • Basic understanding of geometric series and their sums
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the convergence criteria for series, particularly geometric series
  • Learn about telescoping series and how to derive their limits
  • Explore the binomial theorem and its applications in limits
  • Investigate the properties of alternating series and their convergence
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or series convergence, and anyone interested in advanced algebraic techniques for solving series problems.

  • #61
so that would give: n SQRT(n + 3) + 1

correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
No, that would correspond to

n(\sqrt{n+3}+1)=\sqrt{n^3+3n^2}+n
 
  • #63
Hmm i a little confused as to how u got the above? I mite need little more help factoring n.
 
  • #64
You do know that \sqrt{n^2a}=n\sqrt{a} right? That's all I did...
 
  • #65
Ah i actually didnt know that! so with that in min I obtain:

n SQRT(1+3/n) + 1

Am I almost there??
 
  • #66
Ah, yes, that is correct. So our limit is

\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{\frac{3n}{n(\sqrt{1+3/n}+1)}

Cancel the n. Then substitute n=+\infty, and see what you get...
 
  • #67
Yes i see so would be:

3/SQRT(1+3/n) +1

So as n tends to infinty the 3/n becomes zero leaving:

3/SQRT(1) + 1

which is 3/2 or 1.5
Correct?
 
  • #68
Yes, you'll get 3 in the numerator. But what happens if you substitute infinity in the denumerator?
 
  • #69
Is post 67 correct micromass?
 
  • #70
Yes, 3/2 is the correct answer.
 
  • #71
fantastic I just have to use the binomial therom now it says to prove this. what part would i apply this to?
 
  • #72
Think I have solved it:

Using (1+x)^r where r is not a whole number. I obtain:

1+3/2.(n) - 1/8 - 1/16 ...

so as the expansion continues the values get closer to zero leaving 1 + 3/2(n)
 
  • #73
I realize I may have ae a mistake. Am i on the rite track?
 
  • #74
Jamiey1988 said:
fantastic I just have to use the binomial therom now it says to prove this. what part would i apply this to?

Use the binomial theorem to prove what??
 
  • #75
the limit I think.
 
  • #76
No, I'm just confused. What exactly are you trying to prove now?
 
  • #77
My original question stated. Using simple algebra find the limit of this sequence as n tends to infinity. Then confirm this using the binomial therom.
 
  • #78
I have no idea what they mean with "confirm with the binomial theorem"...

Do they mean this:

(x-y)^r=\sum_{k=0}^{+\infty}{\binom{r}{k}x^{r-k}y^k}

if so, you just need to substitute x=n2, y=3n and r=1/2...
 
  • #79
Possibly, if that is the case I just sub in values for x y and r. Then what?
 
  • #80
Calculate (n^2-n)^{1/2}-n with the binomial theorem. What does that give you?
 
  • #81
Sorry I am nt to sure how to do that when r = 1/2
 
  • #82
Ok well I am going to come back to that. The bext question I am asked is to describe the sequence that SQRT(n^2 +3n) -n generates:

Substituting in values for n I obtain:

0,1,((SQRT10)-2),((SQRT18)-3), ((SQRT28) -4),...

From this am i correct in saying it is positive and monotonic, And converges to 3/2 as already discovered. Are there any upper lower bounds?
 
  • #83
You'll have to prove that it is positive and monotonic...
 
  • #84
Ok well monotonic is where the next value is greater than or equal to the previous one correct?? So can't I just set two values next to each other:

1<((SQRT10) -2)
 
  • #85
Yes, but this only proves it for n=1 and n=2. You'll need to show it for every n. You'll need to show that for every n

\sqrt{n^2+3n}-n\leq \sqrt{(n+1)^2+3(n+1)}-(n+1)
 
  • #86
Ah ok so from what u have written above. As the sequence is increasing we can say:
an + (an+1) is always positive.

so an + (an+1) = SQRT(n^2 +3n)-n + SQRT((n+1)^2 +3(n+1)) -(n+1)
 
Last edited:
  • #87
No, you need to prove that...
 
  • #88
Scratch that above should it be an+1 - an is always positive??
so I will have:

an+1 - an = + SQRT((n+1)^2 +3(n+1)) -(n+1) - SQRT(n^2 +3n)-n
 
  • #89
Yes.

(note: the forum rules explicitely forbid that you edit posts that already have been answered to. So please do not do this)
 
  • #90
Rite so is that just the answer then??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K