Reason behind the definition of Helmholtz free Energy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the reasoning behind the definition of Helmholtz free energy as F = -kT ln Z, exploring its relationship to classical thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. Participants examine the implications of this definition in the context of different thermodynamic ensembles and the compatibility between statistical mechanics and thermodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the definition of Helmholtz free energy is merely a convenience due to its relation to macroscopic thermodynamic observables at constant temperature.
  • Another participant notes that free energies are defined from classical thermodynamics and that the identification of F = -kT ln Z aligns statistical mechanics with thermodynamics, suggesting that different ensembles yield compatible results.
  • A participant acknowledges the historical context, recognizing that classical thermodynamics predates statistical mechanics, which informs the definitions used in statistical mechanics.
  • One participant introduces the concept of the entropy-maximum principle in statistical mechanics, explaining that Helmholtz free energy can be viewed as a Legendre transformation of entropy, facilitating the transition between functions of energy and temperature.
  • A link to an external resource is provided for further reading on the relation of Helmholtz free energy to the partition function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying perspectives on the relationship between classical thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, with some agreeing on the compatibility of the two frameworks while others highlight the differences in definitions and their historical development. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent to which the definition is a matter of convenience versus a deeper theoretical necessity.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different thermodynamic ensembles and their implications, but the discussion does not resolve the nuances of these relationships or the specific conditions under which different definitions apply.

Narcol2000
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
What is the reasoning behind defining the helmholtz free energy as F = -kT ln Z?

I always wanted to know why it was just defined as the above. Is it as a form of convenience because the macroscopic theromodynamic observables of a system at constant temperature (ie the canonical ensemble) are related to to the partition function as ln Z?

ie.

<br /> \bar{E} = -\frac{\partial lnZ}{\partial \beta}<br />

and

<br /> P = \frac{1}{\beta}\left(\frac{\partial lnZ}{\partial V}\right)_\beta<br />

So its just convenient to a create a thermodynamic quantity that is related to T ln Z for a system at temperature T?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The free energies are defined from classical thermodynamics, without any reference to the partition function of statistical mechanics. Which particular free energy (Enthalpy, Helmholtz, Gibbs etc) is most convenient depends on what variables you keep constant in the experiment.

The partition function is a quantity that is defined from the canonical ensemble of statistical mechanics. And as you guessed, the identification of F=-kTlnZ is just what turns out to make statistical mechanics and thermodynamics compatible. If you use other ensembles in statistical mechanics, then you make other identifications so that statistical mechanics and thermodynamics are compatible. For example, if you use the microcanonical ensemble, then you use S=kln(number of states). The different ensembles of statistical mechanics yield the same thermodynamical answers in many common situations (magically), but they are not always equivalent: http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0404655
 
Ah of course, in my haste i forgot the obvious fact that classical thermodynamics was established before the statistical treatment was even investigated.

So the statistical definitions are just chosen so they correctly correspond to the classical thermo definitions.

Thanks :)
 
Statistical Mechanics is founded on the entropy-maximum principle, that is, a generalization of a Laplace's indifference principle. Your formal approach is to define a density operator based on informations you have and then find equilibrium state by maximizing the corrispondent entropy. Since entropy is function of extensive quantity (not easly measurable) it is convenient to define another function with same variational principle but different arguments (i.e. intensive variable associate). The mathematically way for doing that is by Legendre transformation.

In SM view, Helmholtz free energy is Legendre transformation of entropy when your density operator is canonical. You use it for switching between a function of energy (entropy) to a function of temperature (free energy).

Ll.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K