Temperature CONFUSION in derivation for Helmholtz Free Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of Helmholtz Free Energy (A) from the second law of thermodynamics, specifically the confusion surrounding the temperature variable (T) in the equation dS(surrounds) = -dU(system)/T. The author questions whether T refers to the system's temperature or the surroundings', highlighting inconsistencies in existing literature. The conclusion emphasizes that both interpretations lead to contradictions in the derivation of A, necessitating a clearer understanding of the temperature context in thermodynamic equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the second law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with Helmholtz Free Energy and its derivation
  • Knowledge of entropy and its relation to heat exchange
  • Basic concepts of thermodynamic systems and surroundings
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the definitions and applications of Helmholtz Free Energy in thermodynamics
  • Study the role of temperature in thermodynamic equations, focusing on absolute temperature
  • Examine the relationship between internal energy and entropy in thermodynamic systems
  • Explore advanced thermodynamic texts for deeper insights, such as "Thermal Physics" by D.V. Schroeder
USEFUL FOR

Students of thermodynamics, physicists, and engineers seeking clarity on the derivation and implications of Helmholtz Free Energy in relation to temperature and entropy.

daniel_r35
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I have been spending 12 hours on this and cannot seem to come up with a solution.

We derive Helmholtz Free Energy (A) from the second law of thermodynamics.

dS(Total) = dS(system) + dS(surrounds)

we try to express dS(surrounds) with properties of the system.

Assuming constant volume (so q=W) and constant temperature (WHICH AS FAR AS I UNDERSTAND it means that the system and surrounds each remain at their original temperatures but CAN HAVE DEIFFERENT temperatures - which they must if not dS(Total) is zero and you can't derive A),

so we get dS(surrounds) = -dU(system)/T...Now NOBODY, not my books, not the internet, NOBODY!says what 'T' is! THEY SAY IT'S the ABSOLUTE TEMPERATURE! But is it that of the SYSTEM or SURROUNDS?!

If it WAS THE SYSTEM, then it WILL NOT MAKE SENSE, because:

dS(system) is ALREADY +dU(system)/Tsystem.

if you say dS(surrounds) is -dU(system)/Tsystem then dS(total) = ZERO and you can't prove A because A = -TdS!

IF it WAS THE SURROUNDS, IT STILL DOESN'T MAKE SENSE:

because we will get A = -TdS(Total) = dU(system) - T(surrounds).dS(system)

What on Earth will Tsurrounds.dSsystem get you?!

EVERY BOOK will say in Helmholtz free energy, we have expressed it in terms of the internal energy of the system and the TEMPERATURE OF THE SYSTEM! (As though they MEANT for the Temperature to be of the system and not the surrounds)!

but based on my knowledge of entropy shouldn't it be temperature of surrounds, because the entropy of the surrounds should be the heat exchanged AT THAT TEMPERATURE belonging to the surrounds?! we know the heat exchanged is -dUsystem. No doubt about that. But what about T?! Either case doesn't work!

PLEASE! HELP ME!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Let me quote from D.V. Schroeder, Thermal Physics (Addison Wesley Longman, 2000):
[The Helholtz free energy] is the total energy needed to create the system, minus the heat you can get for free from an environment at temperature ##T##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K