B Rebound Height vs Air Pressure: A Puzzling Relationship

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between air pressure in a basketball and its rebound height, questioning why the graph does not have a line of best fit through the origin. It is noted that the rebound height is expected to be zero below a certain air pressure threshold, indicating a non-linear relationship. Participants suggest that the rebound height increases rapidly over a small range of pressure before flattening out, rather than being directly proportional. The conversation also touches on the lack of data at lower pressures and the potential for a logarithmic fit. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing the performance of basketballs under varying air pressures.
innocentasker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
OP tried to delete his post and the thread title, but they have been restored by the Mentors
TL;DR Summary
-
Hi all
I have a very quick question
I'm trying to understand why a graph of Rebound height (m) vs Air Pressure (x axis) doesn't have a line of best fit which goes through the origin.
I understand a basketball's bounce can be compared to the compression of a mass-spring system but then why doesn't it have a directly proportional relationship between its air pressure and rebound height?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why should it? The maximum rebound height is the height it was dropped from, so it can't reboubd beyond that however high the pressure.
 
My apologies i should've framed my question better...i understand that it can't rebound beyond it's drop height but until that height...could you help me understand why air pressure is not directly proportional to the rebound height?
For example..
a 3 psi ball may bounce to 1.5m
And the same ball at 3.5 psi may bounce to 1.8m
But the same ball at 4 psi may bounce to 2.1m

Does it have anything to do with the COR of the ball?
Thanks in advance
 
innocentasker said:
I'm trying to understand why a graph of Rebound height (m) vs Air Pressure (x axis) doesn't have a line of best fit which goes through the origin.
Welcome to PF. :smile:

Can you post a link to the graph you are referring to? Also, I would think the rebound height would be zero when you get down below about 0.5psi or so -- that's a pretty flat basketball...

1643124498616.png

https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/flat-basketball-isolated-gm182481240-11881459
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
innocentasker said:
could you help me understand why air pressure is not directly proportional to the rebound height?
Why should it be linear? You'd expect the rebound to be zero until it reaches a minimum threshold. Then, I'd expect it to increase quickly over some relatively small range of pressure until it reaches the next threshold, where it is bouncing normally. I'm not sure about the curve here and how close to linear that would be. Then, the curve would flatten out and any further increase would be minimal.

There's no reason for it to be linear.
 
But you don't have any data below 6psi? I'm pretty sure it will drop like a stone and intersect the x-axis before the origin...
 
is this what you mean? i think its a logarithmic fit but i don't understand why
1643126380865.png

PeroK said:
Why should it be linear? You'd expect the rebound to be zero until it reaches a minimum threshold. Then, I'd expect it to increase quickly over some relatively small range of pressure until it reaches the next threshold, where it is bouncing normally. I'm not sure about the curve here and how close to linear that would be. Then, the curve would flatten out and any further increase would be minimal.

There's no reason for it to be linear.
 
innocentasker said:
is this what you mean? i think its a logarithmic fit but i don't understand whyView attachment 296014
I wouldn't like to guess the shape, but I imagine the height would drop off far more quickly than that.

Why? Exprience of playing football (soccer) as a child. It only took the ball to lose a bit of air pressure for the game to be ruined. A half-inflated ball was no use. It would just flop around.

You youngsters these days probably spent your childhood sitting indoors playing computer soccer where the ball never goes flat! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and russ_watters
  • #10
I did a Google search on basketball rebound height vs pressure and got lots of hits. But I didn't find any experiments that went below about 5-6psi. Maybe you will be the first to plot that data! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #11
innocentasker said:
Summary:: -

Hi all
I have a very quick question
I'm trying to understand why a graph of Rebound height (m) vs Air Pressure (x axis) doesn't have a line of best fit which goes through the origin.
I understand a basketball's bounce can be compared to the compression of a mass-spring system but then why doesn't it have a directly proportional relationship between its air pressure and rebound height?
Please do not try to delete your OP and the thread title (and your posts!) -- that is usually a sign that a student is trying to cheat on their homework. Your OP and thread title have been restored, and this thread is now locked.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71, gmax137 and russ_watters
Back
Top