Reciprocating Engines and Use of Vaccum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monday
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engines
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the mechanics of reciprocating engines, specifically comparing traditional steam engines with vacuum engines. It establishes that steam engines utilize the pressure differential created by boiling water to generate mechanical output, while vacuum engines operate by exposing one side of the piston to a vacuum and the other to atmospheric pressure. The conversation highlights that using gaseous water in a vacuum environment is less effective due to low vapor pressure at standard temperatures, which limits the pressure differential necessary for efficient operation. Ultimately, steam engines are preferred for their ability to generate significant pressure through steam expansion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of steam engine mechanics and pressure differentials
  • Knowledge of vapor pressure and its relation to temperature
  • Familiarity with the principles of thermodynamics
  • Basic concepts of reciprocating engine design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of steam generation and pressure differentials in steam engines
  • Explore the mechanics of vacuum engines and their efficiency compared to traditional engines
  • Investigate the effects of temperature on vapor pressure in various fluids
  • Learn about the latent heat of vaporization and its impact on engine performance
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, mechanical designers, and students studying thermodynamics or engine mechanics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the comparative efficiencies of steam and vacuum reciprocating engines.

Monday
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have a random query that I suspect you guys will able to help me with on reciprocating engines (ala like steam engines rather than petrol motors).

In the classic steam engines, obviously boiling water in a Pressure vessel and fed through a reciprocating engine is able to produce useful mechanical output, which relies on the expansive properties of steam and obviously pressure differential between the pressure vessel and the atmosphere.

I have also seen on YouTube there are reciprocating engines that run on a vacuum being applied at the exhaust output, rather than apply greater-than-atmosphere pressure at the inlet. In this scenario, obviously pressure differential exists so that the mechanical output is able to be produced.

My question is this:-

In a vacuum reciprocating engine (assuming the vacuum is sufficiently effective tending towards zero atmospheres), is the inlet side of the engine better off to be exposed to standard atmosphere, or if you had a vessel with water in it (which at standard Earth temperatures in a vacuum would become gaseous) having a feed of gaseous water - that is to say, does gaseous water also produce useful expansive properties in a reciprocating engine in a vacuum environment at atmospheric temperatures in the same way that a standard steam engine works as we currently know. Also, would using gaseous water be more effective / efficient than a standard feed of atmosphere in such a reciprocating engine?

Hope this makes sense - any thoughts would be gratefully received!

Thanks,
M
 
Science news on Phys.org
First off, most car engines are reciprocating.

Steam engines work on the pressure differential between the two side of the piston.

The pressure is generated by the raising of water to steam in the boiler. Water boils at 100 degrees celsius at 1 atm, because this is the vapour pressure of water at this temperature. As you raise the water temperature, the vapour pressure of the water increases, and water evaporates to steam until the pressure in the boiler is at the water vapour pressure.

This high pressure steam is exposed to one side of the piston, expanding the chamber. At the full extent of the piston, a valve siwtches which side is exposed to high pressure steam, while the first chamber is vented to atmosphere.

A vacuum engine would work in reverse, exposing vacuum (suction) to one side of the piston, while the other side was pushed with atmospheric air. Once the valve switches, the air is drawn into the vacuum, while the evacuated side is exposed to air. Unless you had an enormous vacuum chamber relative to the stroke volume, you would not get a large number of strokes out of this.

This is why steam engines use water- it can form a huge volume of steam. You could just use a cylinder of compressed air.

As to using room temperature water, on the air side, you could, but the vapour pressure of water is actually very low at 20 degrees C, and you would get only a small pressure differential. Also, as water vapourises off the water source, it pulls heat out of it through the latent heat of vapourization, further lowering the temperature of the water, and thus its vapour pressure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K