Recommend Quantum Mechanics texts

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for textbooks on Quantum Mechanics for someone with a background in Civil Engineering and a desire to learn about the subject. Participants also discuss necessary prerequisites and foundational topics that may aid in understanding Quantum Mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in learning Quantum Mechanics and seeks textbook recommendations, questioning if their background is sufficient.
  • Several textbooks are recommended, including "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David J. Griffiths and "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by J. J. Sakurai, while one participant advises against using Weinberg's book due to its complex notation.
  • Another participant suggests brushing up on linear algebra and recommends studying Hamiltonian mechanics and basic electromagnetism before diving into Quantum Mechanics.
  • Shankar's book is mentioned as a good resource for mathematical background, with an alternative suggested by Hughes if Shankar is considered too lengthy.
  • There is a query about whether Griffiths covers the necessary statistics for Quantum Mechanics, with a response indicating that only a basic understanding of probability concepts is required.
  • A participant mentions Miller's Quantum Mechanics book as a suitable option for engineers, highlighting its balance between rigor and practical applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of a solid mathematical foundation, particularly in linear algebra, before studying Quantum Mechanics. However, there are varying opinions on which textbooks are most suitable, and no consensus is reached on the necessity of additional statistics knowledge.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of understanding specific mathematical concepts, such as those related to Hilbert spaces, but do not resolve the extent of prerequisite knowledge required for Quantum Mechanics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals with a background in engineering or related fields who are interested in self-studying Quantum Mechanics and are seeking guidance on appropriate resources and foundational topics.

Jmmergens
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I graduated a few years ago with a Bachelors in Civil Engineering and now work as a structural engineer. I have an interest in learning about Quantum Mechanics, more or less because I am a nerd and I like learning these kinds of things. As a part of my degree I took Mulivariable Calculus, the typical undergrad Calc based physics series, linear algebra, differential equations, statics, dynamics, and mechanics of materials.

I don't know if this is enough pre reqs to begin study on the topic of Quantum Mechanics, but if it is would anyone be able to recommend a textbook to order? Or additional topics that need to be studied prior? Older editions would be preferred as they can be acquired cheaper.

Thanks for the advice!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David J Griffiths
Modern Quantum Mechanics by J. J. Sakurai

Personally I do not recommend Weinberg's book as a textbook... because the notation is so hard to handle... it may better to serve as an important reference...
 
Aworrystudent, thank you for the recommendations, I will check them out.

ZeroPivot, throughout my college career I have heard tid bits of information on the subject from instructors and other students, typically the information they gave me was always fascinating. Although I'm sure the whole subject is not fun facts about space and time and how things behave at the sub atomic level, I am still interested. Additionally, when you start deciding your career Quantum Mechanics sounds like the most complicated field you could choose. Although I would never apply it as a career, having some knowledge of the subject would satisfy some curiosity and in some ways feel like reaching the summit of one of the many academic mountains, in a sense. In short, it sounds fun.
 
Brush up on your linear algebra first if it's been a while.

I took an honors class that previously used Shankar for years and switched to McIntyre, a new book, when I took it. The teacher said test scores (for the same types of tests) were up drastically and he credited it to the book.

I recommend reading a little about Hamiltonian mechanics, and some basic e&m (Halliday and Resnick level) first.
 
Sorry for the bump, however, I was wondering if Griffiths goes over the required statistics for the book?
 
sandy.bridge said:
Sorry for the bump, however, I was wondering if Griffiths goes over the required statistics for the book?

I don't know about Griffiths specifically, but there's actually surprisingly little probability/statistics required for an intro QM course. Basically, you just need to have some sense of what the words "probability," "average (expected value)," and "standard deviation (uncertainty)" mean (like even just a high school level understanding). You might come across some unfamiliar terms/ideas, but they should be pretty easy to pick up just by doing a quick Google search. If you want to beef up your math skills before jumping into intro QM, your time is probably much better spent improving your linear algebra (especially stuff centred around Hilbert spaces), because that's used a lot more heavily.

To answer the OP question, if you're an engineer you might want to check out Miller's QM book. I've been going through it in the last little while, and I think he's struck a really good balance between rigor and applications. He teaches you QM properly so that you could move on to a more advanced physics text without much trouble, but he also takes the time to give you some sense of how you can use the theory to design devices, which is really nice to see as an engineer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K