Recommended books/papers in SUSY

  • Thread starter atboria
  • Start date
  • #1
1
1

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hey everyone!

I just wanted some advice in some user-friendly bibliography in SUSY (I have QFT background and GR too, I don't know if this is relevant but whatever...). My intention is to learn it on my own, maybe I can ask some questions to a professor.

Thank you in before!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,255
590
My favorite is the set of notes by Lambert. Imho very accesible. Bilal is also good, but a tougher nut to crack.
 
  • #3
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
10,578
3,327
For an introduction to SUSY particle phenomenology, I recommend Martin
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9709356

For formal aspects of SUSY, no book provides more intermediate steps of calculation than Muller-Kirsten and Wiedemann
https://www.amazon.com/dp/9814293423/?tag=pfamazon01-20
This is the only serious book on theoretical physics I know for which you don't need a pencil and paper.

If you want something free for formal aspects, then it's 1001
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0108200
 
  • #4
1
1
Thank you both!

Maybe I should have specified a little more on my interests. I want to learn SUSY for a better understanding of the AdS/CFT correspondence, so I guess I don't really need the full machinery of the theory (I'm refering to the supersymmetric particles and that type of things), do I?

I will take a look at those references, thank you again!
 
  • #5
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
10,578
3,327
  • #6
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,255
590
Thank you both!

Maybe I should have specified a little more on my interests. I want to learn SUSY for a better understanding of the AdS/CFT correspondence, so I guess I don't really need the full machinery of the theory (I'm refering to the supersymmetric particles and that type of things), do I?

I will take a look at those references, thank you again!
Well, it depends. Understanding means imho also 'being able to do calculations with it'. For that purpose you don't need to understand e.g. the MSSM, but N=4 SYM plays a crucial role in the AdS/CFT correspondence, so it's not a bad idea to understand this theory (e.g. why is it only consistent in certain dimensions? how does the algebra close on the fields? what are the multiplets?)

I'd say that if you want to understand SUSY properly, you can't avoid doing some explicit calculations and checks, and for that you need some technical stuff. Lambert's notes are perfect for that purpose and highly accessible.

Anyway, good luck! :)
 
  • #7
1
1
Well, it depends. Understanding means imho also 'being able to do calculations with it'.
Yeah, I do think so. What I meant is that I want to focus primarily on the main theoretical tools I need to learn in order to gain some insight of the correspondence and I will later learn the details.

To pose it this way: I want a "serious flavor" of what this is about (an intermediate point between a mere description with words and a full understanding of all the consequences, I will get to the latter point as I learn the whole picture)

TL; DR: I agree with you but I don't want to spend too much time on the details.

Thank you both, again!
 
  • #8
4
0
No books. Don't study false models. Give your time to LQG instead.
 
  • #9
1
1
No books. Don't study false models. Give your time to LQG instead.
Wow. What's the experimental way in which you determined that?

I think we shouldn't make such statements as if this was religion or logic.

Thank you for your time.
 
  • #10
4
0
Wow. What's the experimental way in which you determined that?

I think we shouldn't make such statements as if this was religion or logic.

Thank you for your time.


You can simply read the lots of papers and datas about some typical particles decays that violate SUSY. So the experimental way was with experiments themselves.
End of the conversation.
 
  • #11
1
1
You can simply read the lots of papers and datas about some typical particles decays that violate SUSY. So the experimental way was with experiments themselves.
End of the conversation.
Would you please share that information? I'd like to take a look of that too.
 

Related Threads for: Recommended books/papers in SUSY

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top