Recommended books/papers in SUSY

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter atboria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Susy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for user-friendly bibliographies and resources in Supersymmetry (SUSY), particularly for individuals with a background in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and General Relativity (GR). Participants express their interests in learning SUSY to enhance their understanding of the AdS/CFT correspondence, while also addressing differing opinions on the necessity of detailed knowledge versus a more conceptual grasp of the theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks recommendations for accessible resources in SUSY, mentioning their background in QFT and GR.
  • Another participant suggests Lambert's notes as accessible and Bilal's work as more challenging.
  • A third participant recommends Martin for particle phenomenology and Muller-Kirsten and Wiedemann for formal aspects, noting the latter's approach requires no calculations.
  • Several participants discuss the relevance of SUSY knowledge for understanding AdS/CFT correspondence, with one suggesting that basic SUSY knowledge is often included in AdS/CFT introductions.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of being able to perform calculations in SUSY to truly understand it, suggesting Lambert's notes as suitable for this purpose.
  • Another participant expresses a desire to focus on the main theoretical tools without delving into excessive detail initially.
  • Contrarily, some participants argue against studying SUSY, suggesting that one should focus on Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) instead, leading to a debate about the validity of SUSY models.
  • There is a challenge to the assertion that SUSY is a false model, with calls for empirical evidence to support such claims.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement. While some agree on the value of certain resources for learning SUSY, there is contention regarding the validity of SUSY as a model, with some advocating for LQG instead. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the necessity of detailed knowledge versus a more conceptual understanding of SUSY.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about the level of detail required for understanding SUSY in relation to AdS/CFT correspondence, and there are unresolved questions about the empirical validity of SUSY models.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in learning about Supersymmetry, particularly those with a background in theoretical physics, as well as those exploring the relationship between SUSY and AdS/CFT correspondence.

atboria
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Hey everyone!

I just wanted some advice in some user-friendly bibliography in SUSY (I have QFT background and GR too, I don't know if this is relevant but whatever...). My intention is to learn it on my own, maybe I can ask some questions to a professor.

Thank you in before!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My favorite is the set of notes by Lambert. Imho very accesible. Bilal is also good, but a tougher nut to crack.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atboria
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atboria
Thank you both!

Maybe I should have specified a little more on my interests. I want to learn SUSY for a better understanding of the AdS/CFT correspondence, so I guess I don't really need the full machinery of the theory (I'm referring to the supersymmetric particles and that type of things), do I?

I will take a look at those references, thank you again!
 
atboria said:
Thank you both!

Maybe I should have specified a little more on my interests. I want to learn SUSY for a better understanding of the AdS/CFT correspondence, so I guess I don't really need the full machinery of the theory (I'm referring to the supersymmetric particles and that type of things), do I?

I will take a look at those references, thank you again!
Well, it depends. Understanding means imho also 'being able to do calculations with it'. For that purpose you don't need to understand e.g. the MSSM, but N=4 SYM plays a crucial role in the AdS/CFT correspondence, so it's not a bad idea to understand this theory (e.g. why is it only consistent in certain dimensions? how does the algebra close on the fields? what are the multiplets?)

I'd say that if you want to understand SUSY properly, you can't avoid doing some explicit calculations and checks, and for that you need some technical stuff. Lambert's notes are perfect for that purpose and highly accessible.

Anyway, good luck! :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atboria
haushofer said:
Well, it depends. Understanding means imho also 'being able to do calculations with it'.

Yeah, I do think so. What I meant is that I want to focus primarily on the main theoretical tools I need to learn in order to gain some insight of the correspondence and I will later learn the details.

To pose it this way: I want a "serious flavor" of what this is about (an intermediate point between a mere description with words and a full understanding of all the consequences, I will get to the latter point as I learn the whole picture)

TL; DR: I agree with you but I don't want to spend too much time on the details.

Thank you both, again!
 
No books. Don't study false models. Give your time to LQG instead.
 
</Henry> said:
No books. Don't study false models. Give your time to LQG instead.

Wow. What's the experimental way in which you determined that?

I think we shouldn't make such statements as if this was religion or logic.

Thank you for your time.
 
  • #10
atboria said:
Wow. What's the experimental way in which you determined that?

I think we shouldn't make such statements as if this was religion or logic.

Thank you for your time.
You can simply read the lots of papers and datas about some typical particles decays that violate SUSY. So the experimental way was with experiments themselves.
End of the conversation.
 
  • #11
</Henry> said:
You can simply read the lots of papers and datas about some typical particles decays that violate SUSY. So the experimental way was with experiments themselves.
End of the conversation.

Would you please share that information? I'd like to take a look of that too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K