Recommended Cosmology Textbooks for Mathematical and Physics Backgrounds

  • Thread starter Thread starter Carlos L. Janer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    cosmology textbooks
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on recommended textbooks for studying cosmology, particularly for individuals with a solid mathematical and physics background. Key suggestions include "Introduction to Particle Cosmology" by Bambi and Dolgov, and "Cosmology" by Steven Weinberg, with the latter noted for its complexity. Barbara Ryden's notes and Liddle's textbook are also recommended for those needing a less GR-intensive approach. Kolb and Turner’s book is highlighted for its foundational coverage of FRW cosmology, BBN, and inflation without requiring extensive prior knowledge of general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Differential Geometry knowledge, specifically from Nash and Sen or Nakahara.
  • Understanding of Group Theory, as covered in Costa and Fogli's "Symmetries and Group Theory in Particle Physics."
  • Familiarity with Quantum Field Theory, particularly Ryder's textbook.
  • Basic concepts of General Relativity, including field equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Introduction to Particle Cosmology" by Bambi and Dolgov for advanced cosmological concepts.
  • Study "Cosmology" by Steven Weinberg for a comprehensive understanding of cosmological principles.
  • Explore Barbara Ryden's notes for a beginner-friendly introduction to cosmology.
  • Examine "Gravity" by James Hartle for insights into relativity and FRW cosmology.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on cosmology, general relativity, and advanced mathematical concepts in physics.

Carlos L. Janer
Messages
114
Reaction score
3
I'd really appreciate if someone could recommend me a (some) good textbook(s) about cosmology.

My mathematical background knowledge is:

- Usual stuff.
- Differential geometry: Nash and Sen book. Nakahara book
- Topology (algebraic and differential): Nash and Sen book. Nakahara book.
- Group theory: Costa and Fogli book (Symmetries and Group Theory in Particle Physics).

My physics background knowledge is:

- Usual stuff.
- Nuclear physics: None whatsoever.
- QFT: Ryder book.
- Particle physics: Somewhere in between Griffiths and Halzen and Martin.
- General relativity: Never studied seriously before. I just know the general relativity field equations.

Is "Introduction to Particle Cosmology" by Bambi and Dolgov any good? What about Weinberg Cosmology book? Too hard? Do I need more than one?

I don't really know if this is the right place for this post. If it's not, I apologize in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I really like the notes by Barbara Ryden. Liddle has a textbook for which you don't need GR, but I highly recommend you to study that seriously before tackling cosmology.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Carlos L. Janer
Thank you for your advice!
 
Kolb and Turner, though much dated, is excellent for the basics of the FRW cosmology, BBN, inflation, and perturbations. They don't assume much GR, if any, beyond the field equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Carlos L. Janer
Thanks for your help. I only have one question: How do they work with a FRW metric and not use GR?
 
Carlos L. Janer said:
Thanks for your help. I only have one question: How do they work with a FRW metric and not use GR?
They assume some knowledge of differential geometry, including the metric, connection coefficients, curvature, and so on. They expect you to know that you can use the metric from differential geometry to describe the geometry of spacetime, and that dynamics follow from using this metric and an energy-momentum tensor in the field equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Carlos L. Janer
OK, thank you again!
 
I would suggest Gravity by James Hartle. Great book, focuses on relativity and has chapters on FRW cosmology
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K