Recommended texts for self-study [real & functional analysis]

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for self-study texts in real and functional analysis, particularly for individuals with limited prior exposure to the subject. Participants share their experiences with various textbooks and suggest approaches to learning these topics effectively.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests starting with Spivak's Calculus as a refresher before moving on to Rudin or Carothers for real analysis, and Kreyszig for functional analysis.
  • Another participant recommends Wade for Real Analysis, highlighting its readability and comprehensive coverage of necessary topics, including convergence and topology.
  • A different participant mentions "Introduction to Analysis" by Rosenlicht as a potential first book, followed by Shilov and Gurevich's book on integration.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of solid proof writing skills and suggests "A Transition to Advanced Mathematics" by Smith, Eggen, and St. Andre as preparatory material.
  • Another participant recommends Johnsonbaugh & Pfaffenberger's "Foundations of Mathematical Analysis" for its organization and suitability for self-study.
  • Concerns are raised about Kreyszig being too lightweight for functional analysis, with a suggestion to consider Debnath and Mikusinski's "Introduction to Hilbert Spaces with Applications" as a more comprehensive alternative.
  • Some participants express that Rudin should be approached later in the learning process.
  • One participant notes that while Sarason's "Complex Function Theory" is approachable, it lacks sufficient exercises.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of opinions on the best texts for self-study, with no consensus on a single recommended approach. Different preferences for textbooks and study sequences are evident, indicating multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying levels of prior knowledge and emphasize the importance of proof writing skills, which may influence the choice of texts. Some recommendations depend on personal experiences and may not universally apply to all learners.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in self-studying real and functional analysis, particularly those with a background in calculus seeking to deepen their understanding of analysis and related mathematical concepts.

boneh3ad
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
3,482
Reaction score
1,293
Hello,

I have been increasingly running into topics in my field where at least a basic faculty with real and functional analysis would be quite helpful and I would like to go about self-studying a bit in that area. I know that Rudin is the canonical text in the field, but I have also heard that it is not all that accessible for people who are coming into the field with no prior background in the topic. I was wondering if some of you guys might give me a sense of a nice way to approach the topic.

My background is okay, I guess. I have seen the ε-δ definition of a limit, for example, but it doesn't go much deeper than that into analysis. I was thinking about grabbing Spivak's Calculus as a rigorous refresher of sorts and then moving on to Rudin and/or Carothers for real analysis and then possibly Kreyszig's Intorductory Functional Analysis with Applications for that topic. Does this seem like a decent plan of attack or do any of you have any other suggestions?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I used Wade for Real Analysis in undergrad. It's good. It has everything you need to refresh on from calculus, even vector calculus, and its really readable. It has everything you need on convergence of sequences and functions, differentiability and integrability some Fourier analysis and even topology in the reals. Right now I'm using Kreyszig for a graduate class. I've also done "Real Analysis: Measure Theory Integration and Hilbert Spaces", which is more complete than Kreysig but not as approachable as Wade. You want to make sure your proof writing is pretty solid before doing any of these, first doing to first half or so of "A Transition to Advanced Mathematics" by Smith, Eggen, and St. Andre.

For complex I've used "Complex Analysis" by Bak and Newman and "Complex Functiom Theory" by Sarason. The latter is very pretty approachable. You should save Rudin for later.

I would recommend that you also do some Algebra while you work through Wade. The difference in the process of the proofs will be of benefit. "Contemporary Abstract Algebra" by Gallian is incredibly easy to read and has a ton of exercises. I've used "Abstract Algebra" by Dummit And Foote also, it's a bit more in depth than Gallian but Gallian's writing style and format are great. You don't need to do linear algebra before abstract. I finished Gallian before taking Linear Algebra and I thought already having a good abstract foundation made my study of Vector Spaces far richer.

If you do the transition book, Wade, Gallian, and Sarason you'll be on equal footing with most 4th year Math undergrads.

You can PM me if you have any more specific questions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I appreciate the feedback from both of you.
 
A David said:
For complex I've used "Complex Analysis" by Bak and Newman and "Complex Function Theory" by Sarason. The latter is very pretty approachable. You should save Rudin for later.

I should note that Sarason is seriously lacking in exercises.
 
Kreyszig is the minimal starting point for Functional Analysis. I am not saying it's bad, but it's very lightweight. I would call it a prerequisite to start studying functional analysis. If you can afford only one book of that kind, I'd go with Debnath and Mikusinski's "Introduction to Hilber Spaces with Applications".
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0122084381/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
691
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K