Recovering energy from plastics

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy recovery from waste plastics, exploring various methods such as pyrolysis, burning, and conversion to oil. Participants consider the economic viability and efficiency of these processes, particularly in relation to common household plastics like toys and appliance parts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that burning plastics can provide heat, but note that it is inefficient in open air and produces harmful byproducts unless improved methods, such as powderizing and controlled combustion, are used.
  • Others mention commercial practices where plastics are degraded for use in high-temperature incinerators, citing energy ratings that suggest plastics have high energy content.
  • A participant presents calculations regarding HDPE, indicating a theoretical energy recovery ratio of 59:1 when converting HDPE to fuel, while questioning the financial feasibility of such processes.
  • Some participants assert that polyethylenes burn cleanly, which contrasts with concerns about emissions from burning plastics.
  • There are references to advanced methods like thermal depolymerization and molten salt oxidation as potential solutions for energy recovery from plastics.
  • One participant highlights the challenges of converting plastics to liquid fuels, noting the energy required to break down large polymer molecules and the competition with crude oil processes.
  • Another participant mentions that most plastics can be pyrolyzed to oil suitable for use in engines, provided impurities are removed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the best methods for recovering energy from plastics, with no consensus on the most effective or economical approach. Some advocate for burning, while others support conversion to oil or pyrolysis, indicating an ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the efficiency of different processes and the economic implications of energy recovery from plastics, which remain unresolved. Specific technical details and calculations are presented, but their applicability in real-world scenarios is not agreed upon.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals involved in waste management, energy recovery technologies, environmental science, and those exploring innovative solutions for plastic waste.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
Is there an energy efficient way of recovering energy from waste plastics, i know they can be turned back to oil, but is this economical? I am thinking of things like plastic toys and pats from domestic appliances.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Most plastics will burn, so they are a potential source of heat which can then be used in many ways, for example to heat water.
However they don't burn efficiently in normal open air, and if simply set fire to they will produce a lot of sooty carbon compounds, (+CO, CO2 +water)
Burning efficiency could be very much improved by powderising the plastic first then burning it in a environment with added oxygen.
A jet engine uses a similar idea to burn kerosine (aka paraffin) very efficiently, by first turning it into a vapour and then adding highly compressed air before igniting.
Liquid kerosine/paraffin by itself doesn't burn well at all if just ignited in normal atmosphere.
 
Last edited:
wolram said:
Is there an energy efficient way of recovering energy from waste plastics, i know they can be turned back to oil, but is this economical? I am thinking of things like plastic toys and pats from domestic appliances.

There are commercial firms that buy and degrade old plastic into small pieces to power high-temperature incinerators. Here's an interesting link from an industry trade association showing the energy ratings of different fuels and plastics are at the very top of the list. (https://www.plasticsindustry.org/AboutPlastics/content.cfm?ItemNumber=793&navItemNumber=1124 )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wolram said:
Is there an energy efficient way of recovering energy from waste plastics, i know they can be turned back to oil, but is this economical? I am thinking of things like plastic toys and pats from domestic appliances.

As a notachemist, I can only gather data, and propose that it is theoretically possible.

Focusing on HDPE, as "waste plastic" is somewhat of a nightmare, I've come up with the following:

HDPE [High Density Polyethylene, C2H4)n]
Specific heat: 1900 J/(K * kg) [ref]
Change in temperature required for pyrolysis HDPE to fuel: 410 K (430°C Th & 20°C Tc) [ref]
Energy required to change temperature: 780,000 joules [ref: maths]
Energy released by burning 1 kg: 46,300,000 joules [ref, page 8]
Ratio: 59:1 [ref: maths]​

From this, it is obvious that it is theoretically possible to convert HDPE plastic into petrol, economically, from an energy standpoint.

As to whether or not a device can do this, "financially" economically, is an engineering problem.
 
Actually polyethylenes burn quite clean.
 
Check out "Thermal depolymerization" and "Molten salt oxidation"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aikismos
Borek said:
Actually polyethylenes burn quite clean.
I think Wolram's question stemmed from a debate as to whether or not it was better to convert plastics to oil, or just burn them.
According to my latest calculation, there are 660,000,000 tons of plastic in landfills in the United States.
I'm guessing there is at least that much elsewhere.
 
If you could find a way to efficiently convert plastics to liquid fuels (and took the time to talk to a patent attorney), you'd get very rich very quickly. The problem is that even the simplest of plastics (poyethylene) is made of very large polymer molecules, which have to be broken down into much shorter chains (think ball of yarn vs. 1-cm snippets.) That takes energy and, usually, metallic "cracking" catalysts. You can do it, but you'd be competing with the very same process that starts with crude oil - and the latter has a few advantages, in scale and in the cost of feedstock. There might be a way to add shredded plastic to the crude, but even then the cost of transporting and shredding would have to be pretty low, to make the overall effort profitable.
Probably best to recover what energy you can by burning plastics directly - that's what's going to happen to any liquid fuel you might be able to make.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aikismos
Most of the plastics can be pyrolized to oil, which can be used in medium speed reciprocating engine after removing salts and ashes, which are well presented in the fuel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K