Rectangle optimization - possible text error

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a potential error in a textbook problem related to rectangle optimization, specifically questioning whether the problem inadvertently describes a square instead of a rectangle. The subject area is calculus, focusing on optimization techniques involving perimeter and area.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of a possible typo in the textbook's equation, discussing the relationship between rectangles and squares in optimization problems. Questions are raised about the correctness of the provided solutions and the nature of the problem setup.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified a potential typo in the textbook's equation and are discussing its impact on the problem. There is an ongoing exploration of whether the problem's description aligns with the mathematical principles involved, particularly regarding the properties of squares and rectangles in optimization contexts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the presence of a band of erasure in the textbook that obscures some information, which may affect the interpretation of the problem. There is also mention of the need to confirm the correctness of the answers derived from the problem.

quicksilver123
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I may have discovered a textbook error but I'm no calc whiz. I need an assist to find out if the question unintentionally described a square instead of a rectangle.
I have attached the textbooks solution as well as my attempt at a solution.
The numbers check out, I just want to make sure before I submit a request for review to the author (my prof). Of course there's always the potential that he's just trying to be a tricky guy.
IMG_2067.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quicksilver123 said:
Hi,
I may have discovered a textbook error but I'm no calc whiz. I need an assist to find out if the question unintentionally described a square instead of a rectangle.
I have attached the textbooks solution as well as my attempt at a solution.
The numbers check out, I just want to make sure before I submit a request for review to the author (my prof). Of course there's always the potential that he's just trying to be a tricky guy.View attachment 207796

The book's equation
$$ P(x) = x + \frac{440}{x}$$
should be
$$ P(x) = 2x + \frac{440}{x}$$
 
A square IS a rectangle; a rectangle with all sides of equal length.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave and quicksilver123
Anyone confirm that the answer I got is correct?
 
Yes there was a typo in the middle (x should have been 2x), but they apparently carried it through to get the correct answer. One thing to notice about this problem @quicksilver123 is that if you have a rectangle, and you want to maximize area for a given perimeter, the result will be a square. Or if you want to minimize perimeter for a given area, it essentially the same problem, and the result is a square.
 
quicksilver123 said:
Anyone confirm that the answer I got is correct?
Yes Length = Width = sqrt(220) cm. Always remember the units.
 
scottdave said:
there was a typo in the middle (x should have been 2x)
I don't think it was a typo. There is a band of erasure running near-vertically through several lines of text. It wipes out the portions in bold below:

for area is A=xy
We know that xy
P(x) = 2 x
P''(x) =
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K