Recurrence relations define solutions to Bessel equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the recurrence relations $$\frac{dZ_m(x)}{dx}=\frac{1}{2}(Z_{m-1}-Z_{m+1})$$ and $$\frac{2m}{x}Z_m=Z_{m+1}+Z_{m-1}$$ satisfy the Bessel differential equation $$\frac{d^2}{dx^2}Z_m+\frac{1}{x}\frac{d}{dx}Z_m+(1-\frac{m^2}{x^2})Z_m=0$$. The user encounters issues with the substitution leading to $$-\frac{1}{4m}(Z_{m+2}-Z_{m-2})\neq0$$. The solution involves applying the derivative to the first equation, combining terms, and substituting back to derive the Bessel equation correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bessel functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with recurrence relations in mathematical analysis
  • Knowledge of differential equations, specifically second-order linear equations
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly differentiation and substitution techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Bessel functions from their recurrence relations
  • Learn about the properties and applications of Bessel differential equations
  • Explore advanced techniques in solving second-order differential equations
  • Investigate the role of boundary conditions in Bessel function solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with differential equations, particularly those focusing on Bessel functions and their applications in wave propagation and heat conduction.

Dominic Chang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to show that a function defined with the following recurence relations
$$\frac{dZ_m(x)}{dx}=\frac{1}{2}(Z_{m-1}-Z_{m+1})$$ and $$\frac{2m}{x}Z_m=Z_{m+1}+Z_{m-1}$$ satisfies the Bessel differential equation
$$\frac{d^2}{dx^2}Z_m+\frac{1}{x}\frac{d}{dx}Z_m+(1-\frac{m^2}{x^2})Z_m=0$$
However, whenever I do the substitution, I end up with
$$-\frac{1}{4m}(Z_{m+2}-Z_{m-2})\neq0$$
I know that these recurence relations can be derived from the solutions to Bessel's equation, so I don't see why I'm not getting the correct result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apply d/dx to the first equation to get the second derivative you need. Add 1/x times the first derivative and the second derivative. Use the recursion to change all the m+2, m+1, m-1, and m-2 into m. Collect like terms. You should get Bessel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K