Redshift and blueshift in relativistic doppler effect

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding redshift and blueshift in the context of the relativistic Doppler effect, particularly when light is emitted transversely. It clarifies that redshift occurs when the receiver perceives light emitted during the closest approach of two objects, resulting in a redshift factor of 1/γ due to time dilation. Conversely, blueshift is explained through the perspective of the light source, where wavefronts are absorbed at a factor of f γ slower, leading to the blueshift expression. The key takeaway is that when the trajectory of light is perpendicular to the relative motion of the objects, the Doppler effect is influenced solely by time dilation. This understanding resolves the initial confusion about the differing frames of reference for redshift and blueshift.
qazadex
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for an intuitive explanation for the redshift and blueshift phenonema that occurs when a light ray is emitted transversely.

According to wikipedia:

Assuming the objects are not accelerated, light emitted when the objects are closest together will be received some time later, at reception the amount of redshift will be 1/γ.

Light received when the objects are closest together was emitted some time earlier, at reception the amount of blueshift is γ.

Now these expressions can be derived using this formula(a generalized version of the doppler shift):
\frac{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}{1+\frac{v}{c}\cos{\theta}}

However, I'm trying to understand based on the principles of time dilation. The redshift situation makes sense: because of time dilation, successive wavefronts arrive by a factor of λ slower according to the receiver, so the f' is 1/λ * f. However, this logic fails with the blueshifting. A way in which the blueshifting expression could be derived is by looking at the situation from the source of the light, and seeing waves get absorbed by a factor f γ slower, which would lead to the above expression for blueshifting. However, I'm not sure why these frames of reference would need to be chosen.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you already answered your own question. These are indeed just the time dilation factors as seen from either the source or the receiver points of view. The point is that the trajectory of the ray is perpendicular to the relative velocities between the frames. In the red shift case the trajectory is perpendicular from the point of view of the receiver while in the other case it is perpendicular from the point of view of the source. When the trajectory is perpendicular, Doppler effect is given by time dilation alone.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
qazadex said:
I'm looking for an intuitive explanation for the redshift and blueshift phenonema that occurs when a light ray is emitted transversely.

According to wikipedia:

Assuming the objects are not accelerated, light emitted when the objects are closest together will be received some time later, at reception the amount of redshift will be 1/γ.


I would say:

When the objects are closest together according to the receiver, then the amount of redshift will be 1/γ according to the receiver.

And that is because the reciever sees the distance staying constant at that point, so he observes the time dilation and nothing else.
 
Thanks for the answers: it makes pretty much perfect sense now.
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K