Relativistic doppler shift and radar

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relativistic Doppler shift as it applies to radar systems, specifically focusing on a stationary radar and a moving target along the z-axis. Participants explore the calculation of the frequency of the received wave after it bounces back from the target, considering both the emitter and receiver perspectives. The conversation includes attempts to derive expressions for the received frequency and the implications of special relativity in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (OP) proposes a method to calculate the frequency of the received wave by transforming the situation into a source/moving-observer scenario, leading to a derived expression for the received frequency.
  • One participant challenges the OP's reasoning, suggesting that if the problem is approached from the emitter-receiver frame, special relativity (SR) Doppler effects may not be necessary, and hints at using wave propagation concepts instead.
  • Another participant asserts that the received frequency should be calculated using the simple ratio of (c - v)/(c + v) times the initial frequency, implying a simpler approach than the OP's method.
  • Subsequent comments question the necessity of a square root in the frequency expression and emphasize that the Doppler shift must be applied twice, once for each direction of wave propagation between the radar and the target.
  • There is a recognition that the Doppler shift must be applied twice, indicating a consensus on the need for this approach, but without resolving the initial disagreement on the OP's method.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the correctness of the OP's approach and the necessity of special relativity in the calculations. Multiple competing views remain on how to properly account for the Doppler effect in this scenario, and the discussion does not reach a consensus on the best method to derive the received frequency.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in the OP's understanding of special relativity and the application of the Doppler effect, as well as the need for clarity on the assumptions made in the calculations. There are unresolved questions about the equivalence of the two proposed scenarios and the implications of using different frames of reference.

Corvinus96
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Consider at stationnary radar at the origin ##z=0## and a target (speed ##v##) moving along the ##z## axis and away from the radar. The radar is sending plane waves (frequency ##f_i##) to the target and they come back to the radar (the radar is then both an emitter and a receiver). I am interested in the exact expression of the frequency ##f_r## of the received wave (the one that bounces back off the target) viewed by the "receiver part" of the radar.

Here is my attempt to the problem
(I did not learn special relativity) : Because the radar is the observer (and not the moving target), I cannot make directly use of the relativistic doppler shift formula. My goal then is to convert my situation into a source/moving-observer one.

Let's call the ##\tau(t)## the time taken for the emitted wave to go hit the target and come back to the radar. ##\dfrac{\tau(t)}{2}## is then the time taken for the wave to hit the target and is given by this equation :

$$c \left(\dfrac{\tau(t)}{2}\right) = d(t) + v\left(\dfrac{\tau(t)}{2}\right)$$

where ##c## is the speed of light, ##d(t) = d_0+vt## the distance radar-target. We then find :

$$\tau(t) = \dfrac{2d(t)}{c-v} = \dfrac{2d(0)}{c-v} + \dfrac{2vt}{c-v} $$
I now imagine a equivalent situation in which there is no more target but another radar moving with speed ##v_r## which is going to act like the receiver (recall that in the first situation, these two radars were considered as a single entity). The time taken by the emitted wave to hit the receiver is : $$\tau(t) = \dfrac{d_r(t)}{c-v_r} = \dfrac{d_r(0)}{c-v_r} + \dfrac{vt}{c-v_r}$$ where ##d_r(t)## is the distance from the stationnary radar (##z=0##) to the receiving radar. To make those two situations equivalent, I have to equate the two expressions for ##\tau(t)## : $$\dfrac{2d(0)}{c-v} + \dfrac{2vt}{c-v} = \dfrac{d_r(0)}{c-v_r} + \dfrac{vt}{c-v_r}$$ I find $$v_r = \dfrac{2cv}{c+v}$$ The frequency observed by the radar is then (by the relativistic doppler formula): $$f_r = f_i \sqrt{\dfrac{1-v_r/c}{1+v_r/c}} = f_i\sqrt{\dfrac{(1 - \frac{2 v}{c + v})}{(1+\frac{2 v}{c + v})}} = f_i\sqrt{\dfrac{c - v}{c + 3 v}}$$ Is my reasoning correct? Did I forget to make use of special relativity when I calculated ##\tau(t)##? Does the radar hear the same frequency in both situations? (in other words, is it sufficient to equate the two expressions for ##\tau(t)## to make the two situations equivalent from the receiver standpoint?).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, this is not correct. Hints:

1) If you do this all in the emitter receiver frame, you need not use SR Doppler at all, just wave crest propagation to and from a moving mirror.

2) If you do it in the mirror frame, you need to worry about SR Doppler twice, for receding emitter to mirror; and for reflected signal per mirror receding from original source.

You should be able to work it out two ways from these hints, getting the same answer for both.Note, I am deliberately not giving you the extremely simple answer, so you get the satisfaction of deriving it yourself.
 
Last edited:
Since the OP hasn't come back, I will post the answer for the record, in case someone visits this thread. The received frequency is simply (c - v)/(c + v) times the initial frequency.
 
PAllen said:
The received frequency is simply (c - v)/(c + v) times the initial frequency.

Shouldn't there be a square root there?
 
PeterDonis said:
Shouldn't there be a square root there?

The Doppler shift has to be applied twice. First A is the transmitter and B is the receiver; then B is the transmitter and A is the receiver.
 
George Jones said:
The Doppler shift has to be applied twice.

Ah, got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K