Redshift data on stars the same distance from earth

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the absence of detectable redshift differences in stars at the same distance from Earth, regardless of their directional position. It highlights that individual stars within galaxies do not exhibit expansion, with nearby galaxies primarily influenced by local motions rather than cosmological redshift. For obtaining hard data on galactic redshifts, participants recommend utilizing the SIMBAD database and the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) for comprehensive research.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of redshift and its implications in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the SIMBAD database for astronomical data
  • Knowledge of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)
  • Basic concepts of galactic motion and expansion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the SIMBAD database for star data and redshift measurements
  • Explore the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) for galactic redshift information
  • Study the concept of cosmological redshift versus local motion in galaxies
  • Investigate the implications of a preferred direction of expansion in the universe
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and researchers interested in galactic redshift data and the dynamics of star motion within galaxies.

Jim Hasty
Messages
33
Reaction score
8
Can anyone in the cosmology community direct me to hard research data that specifically demonstrates: there is no detectable redshift difference in stars that are the same distance from the Earth but in all different directions. This is of course related to 'does the universe have a preferred direction of expansion', the literature of which I find on google does not provide data, just brief conclusions. Thanks.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Individual stars tend to be visible within our galaxy but there is no expansion of such bound objects. Nearby galaxies have the majority of their red- or blue-shift determined by local motions. It's only when you get to more distant galaxies that cosmological redshift starts to dominate, and by then you cannot make out individual stars. Again their motion would be principally that within the galaxy, what you need to do is measure the average for the whole galaxy.

For hard data on galactic redshifts, I would suggest you start with the SIMBAD database but there are others. Once you know what details you want, you can get more specific advice on search criteria.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jim Hasty
GeorgeDishman said:
Individual stars tend to be visible within our galaxy but there is no expansion of such bound objects. Nearby galaxies have the majority of their red- or blue-shift determined by local motions. It's only when you get to more distant galaxies that cosmological redshift starts to dominate, and by then you cannot make out individual stars. Again their motion would be principally that within the galaxy, what you need to do is measure the average for the whole galaxy.

For hard data on galactic redshifts, I would suggest you start with the SIMBAD database but there are others. Once you know what details you want, you can get more specific advice on search criteria.
Thank you so much, George. This is incredible and helpful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
11K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K