High School Redshift of a light pulse between 2 accelerating rockets

Click For Summary
In the discussion, participants analyze the scenario of two accelerating rockets, focusing on the emission of a light pulse from the trailing rocket. The light pulse is expected to reach the leading rocket after a time of z/c, but concerns are raised about the leading rocket's movement during that time, suggesting the pulse must cover a greater distance. The conversation clarifies that this is a first-order approximation, where the effects of the leading rocket's acceleration are considered negligible for short time intervals. The logic presented in the referenced book is confirmed, emphasizing that higher-order terms can be ignored under certain conditions. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of relativistic effects in accelerating frames.
sphyrch
Messages
37
Reaction score
9
I'm reading book from here. Suppose two rockets are accelerating with the same acceleration ##a## and are separated by some distance ##z##. At time ##t_0## the trailing rocket emits a light pulse. The book tells that pulse reaches leading box after time ##z/c## as seen in background frame. But won't the pulse actually have to cover a distance more than ##z## to reach the front rocket since the front rocket would've moved forward in that time? This on pg 65
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is a first order approximation.
 
Dale said:
Yes, that is a first order approximation.
It like this? If front ship moved extra ##x## dist by the time (say ##t##) light reached, then ##ct-z=ut+at^2/2##. and then we say ##u<<c## so we ignore, and we say that time taken is super short so we ignore ##t^2## too. So every thing gets ignored and we get ##ct-z=0##. This the author logic?
 
More or less, yes. The only other thing is that usually they choose the reference frame where ##u=0##. So the displacement due to acceleration is 2nd order (##at^2/2##)
 
A good one to everyone. My previous post on this subject here on the forum was a fiasco. I’d like to apologize to everyone who did their best to comment and got ignored by me. In defence, I could tell you I had really little time to spend on discussion, and just overlooked the explanations that seemed irrelevant (why they seemed irrelevant, I will tell you at the end of this). Before we get to the point, I will kindly ask you to comment having considered this text carefully, because...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K