Referencing to google books in article

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the appropriate way to reference books accessed through Google Books in academic writing. Participants explore whether to cite the book itself or the online page, considering implications for reliability and accessibility of sources.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest referencing the book itself, as it is the primary source being read, rather than the webpage.
  • Others argue that since references are meant to help readers locate sources, including the URL of the online version is important, especially if the book is not easily available in print.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of referencing the actual book or journal, regardless of its online availability, to ensure the source remains accessible even if the webpage is taken down.
  • Another participant raises a concern about citing older books that may not be available in print, suggesting that referencing the online version could be a practical solution.
  • Some participants note that citation practices may vary depending on the preferences of specific professors or academic contexts, with some rejecting online sources altogether.
  • There is a mention of the need to modify citations for online sources, such as indicating "Online" if page numbers are not available.
  • One participant expresses confidence in the reliability of certain online sources, particularly those from universities, and argues that they are acceptable in academic work.
  • Another participant points out that the discussion does not clarify whether the original question pertains to a class assignment, which could influence citation practices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to referencing books accessed via Google Books. Multiple competing views remain regarding the importance of citing the original source versus the online page.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight that citation practices may depend on specific academic requirements or the context of the assignment, which remains unspecified in the original question.

Shukie
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
If I want to refer to a book that I read on google books, should I reference to the book itself or to the internet page?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The book I believe. This is because I think you are "reading" to book, not the web page, I could be wrong, though.
 
The book as if it was in your hand.

Would you reference the library you got a book from?
 
Never ever link to a website.

The reason why this isn't allowed is because if the information is taken down, the reader can't find your referenced material.

Always reference the actual book/Journal it came from, even if its online.
 
I want to refer to a book from 1827 though, which I doubt you will find anywhere, so Civilized's solution seems pretty good.
 
Cyrus said:
Never ever link to a website.

The reason why this isn't allowed is because if the information is taken down, the reader can't find your referenced material.
You can cite a website, but the way to do it is to include the name of the webpage, the URL, and the date you accessed the site (because you're citing it as you viewed it on that day). If you're going to cite a webpage, I strongly recommend printing a hardcopy (or saving a copy as a PDF), that way you have the material as it appeared when you cited it in case the content changes and someone wants to see your source.

Always reference the actual book/Journal it came from, even if its online.
Yes, if it's not a webpage, but an electronic version of a book or journal, you cite it the same as if you had the hardcopy, bound version in front of you. If it's ONLY available online, then you may need to modify the citation slightly, such as if there are no page numbers, and instead write something like "Online" in that place.
 
Moonbear said:
You can cite a website, but the way to do it is to include the name of the webpage, the URL, and the date you accessed the site (because you're citing it as you viewed it on that day). If you're going to cite a webpage, I strongly recommend printing a hardcopy (or saving a copy as a PDF), that way you have the material as it appeared when you cited it in case the content changes and someone wants to see your source.


Yes, if it's not a webpage, but an electronic version of a book or journal, you cite it the same as if you had the hardcopy, bound version in front of you. If it's ONLY available online, then you may need to modify the citation slightly, such as if there are no page numbers, and instead write something like "Online" in that place.

It depends on who your are giving your paper to. My one professor would not accept *any* online sources - what so ever.
 
I don't see why he wouldn't. If you're careful enough you can find lots of trustworthy information on the web. I do almost always use websites from universities though, if I use internet sources. Those are fairly reliable and my professors accept them.
 
  • #10
One should reference the original source: book, article, . . . . Google books provides a reproduction.
 
  • #11
Cyrus said:
It depends on who your are giving your paper to. My one professor would not accept *any* online sources - what so ever.

That's for a class assignment, and maybe the objective of the exercise was to get you into the library. The question here didn't specify it was for a class assignment, or that any such restrictions were put in place if it were. Just because you have one professor that doesn't allow you to use online sources doesn't mean there is never a reason to cite them nor an appropriate format to do it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K