Reflection at a spherical surface

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the optics of a concave spherical mirror, specifically regarding the calculation of image characteristics such as position, size, orientation, and nature. The original poster presents a problem involving a 0.6 cm tall object placed 16.5 cm from the mirror, which has a radius of curvature of 22.0 cm. There is a focus on understanding the sign convention for the radius of curvature and focal length.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the mirror equation but questions the sign of the radius of curvature based on their lecture notes. Some participants suggest that the notes may be incorrect regarding the sign convention for concave mirrors.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different sign conventions for focal lengths and radii of curvature in optics. Some suggest that the original poster's confusion stems from varying conventions, while others emphasize the importance of consistency in applying these conventions across calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of alternative sign conventions in optics, which may lead to differing interpretations of the problem. The original poster is seeking clarification on the sign convention as it relates to their specific problem setup.

Jon.G
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object 0.6cm tall is placed 16.5cm to the left of the vertex of a concave spherical mirror having a radius of curvature of 22.0cm.
Determine the position, size, orientation and nature of the image.


Homework Equations


[itex]\frac {1}{S} + \frac {1}{S'} = \frac {1}{f} = \frac {2}{R}[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution


[itex]\frac {1}{16.5}+ \frac {1}{S'} = \frac {2}{-22}[/itex]
[itex]\frac {1}{S'} = -\frac{1}{11} - \frac {1}{16.5}[/itex]
[itex]S' = -6.6cm[/itex]
However, the answer given is 33.0cm, which you get when R = +22.0 , not -22.0
In my lecture notes is definitely says that the radius of curvature for a concave mirror is negative.
Are the notes wrong? Or is there something I am missing?

(Using 33.0cm as S' I can get the answers to the other parts of the question, I just want a little bit of help in understanding why the radius of curvature is positive)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The focal length is taken positive in case of a concave mirror. F=|R|/2

ehild
 
The notes are wrong. Concave mirrors and convex lenses have positive focal distance while convex mirrors and concave lenses have negative focal distances.
 
dauto said:
The notes are wrong. Concave mirrors and convex lenses have positive focal distance while convex mirrors and concave lenses have negative focal distances.
I'm not sure that there is a universally agreed convention. The important thing is to pick a convention and ensure all your equations conform to it.

The convention used at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_of_curvature_(optics) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_length seems good to me. You treat the incoming ray as coming from the negative side to the positive. The radius of the surface is always taken as the offset from the surface to the centre of curvature. So we have concave negative, convex positive whether it be a mirror, or the entry surface of a lens, but reversed for the exit surface of a lens.
Correspondingly, the focal length formula for a lens uses 1/R1 - 1/R2. Thus, for a biconvex lens we get a positive minus a negative, and the curvatures reinforce.

The error in the OP is the sign of S.
 
Yes there are alternative sign conventions but the one I described is the easiest.
 
dauto said:
Yes there are alternative sign conventions but the one I described is the easiest.
How so?
 
haruspex said:
How so?

Gaussian sign convention is easier for students that are being introduced to the subject because
* The equations used for mirrors and lenses become identical
* A minus sign for image location corresponds to a virtual image and the same thing is true for an object

The disadvantage is
* The sign convention for an object seems backwards (the left sign of the axis is negative, they are not used to that)

My experience is that students find the advantages to outweigh the disadvantages
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K