I Reflectivity of Pure Metals in Vacuum

Click For Summary
The discussion highlights the difference in reflectivity between pure metals and their oxidized forms, particularly focusing on aluminum in atmospheric conditions versus vacuum. It emphasizes that pure aluminum, as used in the James Webb telescope, would be highly reflective in a vacuum but is subject to oxidation on Earth. The conversation raises the need for reliable data on the reflectivity of pure metals like calcium, magnesium, and titanium in vacuum conditions. Participants express concern over the accuracy of sources that conflate the reflectivity of pure metals with their oxidized states. The topic underscores the challenges of conducting scientific investigations in atmospheric conditions while seeking precise reflectivity data.
jms4
Messages
37
Reaction score
2
All data I see online about reflectivity of metals is about aluminum in the atmosphere meaning oxidized aluminum, but pure aluminum in vacuum in case of the James Webb telescope would also be extremely reflective but building it on Earth means it's going to get oxidized, similarly there are a lot of pure metals out there which would be very reflective in vacuum such as calcium or magnesium or titanium if they wouldn't oxidize in the atmosphere. Is there any data about most reflective materials pure materials in vacuum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have an example source you can provide? I feel like there may be a disconnect between the question and the answers you are finding, as a quality source should be giving you exactly what it tells you it is giving you. If it says reflectivity of Al it should be reflectivity of Al, not Al2O3. There are work-arounds to the problem of working in the atmosphere, though they may be too cumbersome to bother with for anything but a scientific investigation.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
566
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
15K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K