I Reflectivity of Pure Metals in Vacuum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the difference in reflectivity between pure metals and their oxidized forms, particularly focusing on aluminum in atmospheric conditions versus vacuum. It emphasizes that pure aluminum, as used in the James Webb telescope, would be highly reflective in a vacuum but is subject to oxidation on Earth. The conversation raises the need for reliable data on the reflectivity of pure metals like calcium, magnesium, and titanium in vacuum conditions. Participants express concern over the accuracy of sources that conflate the reflectivity of pure metals with their oxidized states. The topic underscores the challenges of conducting scientific investigations in atmospheric conditions while seeking precise reflectivity data.
jms4
Messages
37
Reaction score
2
All data I see online about reflectivity of metals is about aluminum in the atmosphere meaning oxidized aluminum, but pure aluminum in vacuum in case of the James Webb telescope would also be extremely reflective but building it on Earth means it's going to get oxidized, similarly there are a lot of pure metals out there which would be very reflective in vacuum such as calcium or magnesium or titanium if they wouldn't oxidize in the atmosphere. Is there any data about most reflective materials pure materials in vacuum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have an example source you can provide? I feel like there may be a disconnect between the question and the answers you are finding, as a quality source should be giving you exactly what it tells you it is giving you. If it says reflectivity of Al it should be reflectivity of Al, not Al2O3. There are work-arounds to the problem of working in the atmosphere, though they may be too cumbersome to bother with for anything but a scientific investigation.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top