I Reflectivity of Pure Metals in Vacuum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the difference in reflectivity between pure metals and their oxidized forms, particularly focusing on aluminum in atmospheric conditions versus vacuum. It emphasizes that pure aluminum, as used in the James Webb telescope, would be highly reflective in a vacuum but is subject to oxidation on Earth. The conversation raises the need for reliable data on the reflectivity of pure metals like calcium, magnesium, and titanium in vacuum conditions. Participants express concern over the accuracy of sources that conflate the reflectivity of pure metals with their oxidized states. The topic underscores the challenges of conducting scientific investigations in atmospheric conditions while seeking precise reflectivity data.
jms4
Messages
37
Reaction score
2
All data I see online about reflectivity of metals is about aluminum in the atmosphere meaning oxidized aluminum, but pure aluminum in vacuum in case of the James Webb telescope would also be extremely reflective but building it on Earth means it's going to get oxidized, similarly there are a lot of pure metals out there which would be very reflective in vacuum such as calcium or magnesium or titanium if they wouldn't oxidize in the atmosphere. Is there any data about most reflective materials pure materials in vacuum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have an example source you can provide? I feel like there may be a disconnect between the question and the answers you are finding, as a quality source should be giving you exactly what it tells you it is giving you. If it says reflectivity of Al it should be reflectivity of Al, not Al2O3. There are work-arounds to the problem of working in the atmosphere, though they may be too cumbersome to bother with for anything but a scientific investigation.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top