Refraction (magnification) - very basic

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the object distance and focal length of a lens that produces a real image twice the size of the object, located 15 cm from the lens. The magnification (m) is defined as -2 due to the nature of real images being inverted. Consequently, the object distance (p) is calculated as 7.5 cm, resolving the initial confusion regarding the negative value. Understanding the sign conventions in optics is crucial for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of lens formulas in optics
  • Familiarity with magnification concepts
  • Knowledge of sign conventions in optics
  • Basic algebra skills for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the lens formula: 1/f = 1/p + 1/i
  • Learn about different types of lenses and their properties
  • Explore real vs. virtual images in optics
  • Investigate the impact of focal length on image formation
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding lens behavior and image formation principles.

FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Question:

A lens produces a real image that is twice as large as the object and is located 15 cm from the lens. Find (a) the object distance and (b) the focal length of the
lens.

[tex]m = \frac{-i}{p}[/tex]

So the image is twice as large so obviously [tex]m = 2[/tex]. The lens produces a real image that is 15cm from the lens. Thus, [tex]i > 0[/tex] RIGHT? So we are simply left with,

[tex]p = \frac{-15cm}{2}[/tex]. How can [tex]p[/tex] (the objects distance) be negative? This doesn't make any sense to me. I can resolve this physically but not in the math... I would like to know why.

This problem should be trivial.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The issue here is that there are bunch of easy-to-forget sign conventions that go along with the optics formulas. In particular: we are dealing here with a REAL image. Real images are ALWAYS inverted. Because the real image is inverted, it's magnification is technically -2, not +2. This will solve your sign problem and make the object distance positive.
 
Thanks :)

I figured it would be something simple like that. Much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K