Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Regarding Upper and lower integral sets.

  1. Aug 15, 2012 #1
    I am having some doubts in the definitions of the upper and lower integrals in apostol.

    There is a statement saying "Let S denote the set of all numbers [itex]_{a}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex] [itex]^{b}[/itex] s(x) dx obtained as s runs through all step functions below f i.e. S = { [itex]_{a}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex] [itex]^{b}[/itex] s(x) dx | s < f} "

    I did not get this. Shouldn't S be a singleton with a only a single element being the summation of the area of all the step functions below f ?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 15, 2012 #2

    Bacle2

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    From what I get, the integral refers to the numerical value of the step function

    satisfying the condition s<f. So for each such step function you get the associated

    number, so you end with S as a collection of numbers.
     
  4. Aug 15, 2012 #3
    When I do a [itex]\int[/itex][itex]_{a}[/itex][itex]^{b}[/itex] s(x) dx I should have single number no? Even if he is considering different values for the step functions he should finally sum it up because the definition of integration says so right?
     
  5. Aug 15, 2012 #4

    Bacle2

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    That sounds right; for each choice of step function you get a numerical value-- the

    Riemann integral of the step function.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Regarding Upper and lower integral sets.
  1. Upper and Lower Limits (Replies: 5)

  2. Upper and Lower Sums (Replies: 5)

Loading...