Finding the Rate of Change of Water Height in a Filling Cylindrical Tank

  • Thread starter Thread starter starstruck_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Related rates
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a related rates problem involving a cylindrical tank with a radius of 5 meters being filled with water at a rate of 3 m³/min. The key equation used is the volume formula v = πr²h, which leads to the relationship h = v/(πr²). Participants emphasize the importance of differentiating with respect to time (d/dt) and correctly applying derivatives to find the rate of change of height (h'). The final result for the rate of height increase is confirmed to be 3/(25π) m/min after proper substitution and simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of related rates in calculus
  • Familiarity with the volume formula for a cylinder (v = πr²h)
  • Knowledge of differentiation with respect to time (d/dt)
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of related rates in calculus
  • Learn how to apply the chain rule in differentiation
  • Explore practical applications of related rates in real-world scenarios
  • Practice solving similar problems involving cylindrical volumes and rates of change
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those struggling with related rates problems, and educators looking for examples to illustrate the concept in a classroom setting.

starstruck_
Messages
185
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



((I cannot, for the love of life, understand related rates, so please bear with me. Thank you! ))

A cylindrical tank with radius 5m is being filled with water at a rate of 3m3/min. How fast is the height of the water increasing?

I'm having trouble interpreting this question - actually, most related rates questions, having trouble differentiating between what I would call the volume and what not.

Homework Equations


v= (pi)r2h

The Attempt at a Solution


So, I'm going to say that I know the rate of change of the volume - which means I need to get the height in terms of the volume?

since v= (pi)r2h
h= v/((pi)r2)

h' = (dy/dx [v]((pi)r2) - dy/dx[(pi)r2](v))/((pi)2r4)
h' = (3(2pir^2) - 2pirv)/ ((pi)2r4)I'm pretty sure this is wrong since I ended up with a "v" in my numerator which I don't know the value of.
How would I go about solving this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your dy/dx? You have no variable called x nor one called y in your expressions.
 
Orodruin said:
What is your dy/dx? You have no variable called x nor one called y in your expressions.
I probably shouldn't have written that, my bad - I just meant to use it as a way to say derivative of.

so, derivative of volume multiplied by the denominator minus the derivative of the denominator multiplied by the volume, over the denominator squared.
 
starstruck_ said:
I probably shouldn't have written that, my bad - I just meant to use it as a way to say derivative of.
I am sorry, but that is a really bad notation. What you want to do is to take the derivative of the expression with respect to time ##t##. That derivative operator should be written ##d/dt##, not anything else. You need to specify what you are taking the derivative with respect to. There is no general "derivative of".

Also, think about what variables in your expression actually depend on ##t##. The derivatives of the other variables with respect to ##t## are going to be zero.
 
Orodruin said:
I am sorry, but that is a really bad notation. What you want to do is to take the derivative of the expression with respect to time ##t##. That derivative operator should be written ##d/dt##, not anything else. You need to specify what you are taking the derivative with respect to. There is no general "derivative of".

Also, think about what variables in your expression actually depend on ##t##. The derivatives of the other variables with respect to ##t## are going to be zero.
so would it be d/dt[v](piR^2)/(pi^2R^4) ?
Does this mean my reasoning was correct? I messed up with the actual derivative part, but I've been having much more trouble understanding what to do or what reasoning is correct
 
Your idea of taking the derivative of the expression for h is correct, yes. I am still not completely sure what you mean by your expression. Can you insert the numbers to get the final result so that we can be sure?
 
I am still not completely sure what you mean by your expression. Can you insert the numbers to get the final result so that we can be sure?[/QUOTE]

I got the same answer as the textbook after plugging in my answers but if I take the expression I came up with:
d/dt[v](piR^2)/(pi^2R^4)

d/dt[v] = 3
R = 5
so: [3(pi)(25)]/[(pi)2(625)]
= 3/25(pi)
 
starstruck_ said:
so would it be d/dt[v](piR^2)/(pi^2R^4) ?
Does this mean my reasoning was correct? I messed up with the actual derivative part, but I've been having much more trouble understanding what to do or what reasoning is correct
Note that ##r## is a constant in this problem. So is ##\pi##!

This is the first time I've ever seen anyone differentiate ##\pi##.

You don't differentiate constants.
 
PeroK said:
Note that ##r## is a constant in this problem. So is ##\pi##!

This is the first time I've ever seen anyone differentiate ##\pi##.

You don't differentiate constants.

I didn't differentiate ##\pi##. It was being multiplied so I kept it as is but I did differentiate r which I wasn't supposed to.
 
  • #10
I would suggest the following:
  • You are overcomplicating your answer by not cancelling the ##\pi R^2## from your numerator with the corresponding terms in the denominator.
  • You should always use units. This will help you along by giving you a consistency check in your answer.
In this case, the units would give you dv/dt = 3 m^3/min (you really should write it like this rather than d/dt[v]), R = 5 m, R^2 = 25 m^2. Hence
$$
\frac{dv}{dt}\frac{1}{\pi R^2} = \frac{3\ \mbox{m}^3/\mbox{min}}{\pi (25 \ \mbox{m}^2)} = \frac{3}{25\pi} \ \mbox{m/min}.
$$
 
  • #11
starstruck_ said:
I didn't differentiate ##\pi##. It was being multiplied so I kept it as is but I did differentiate r which I wasn't supposed to.
Okay, I see what you did now.
 
  • #12
Also, note that you can also differentiate before you solve for ##h##, it will give you the same result. (Writing ##v'(t)## and ##h'(t)## rather than ##dv/dt## and ##dh/dt##)
$$
v(t) = \pi R^2 h(t) \quad \Longrightarrow \quad v'(t) = \pi R^2 h'(t).
$$
Then ##h'(t)## is just the rate you are after and so you can solve for it in terms of ##v'(t)##, which you have.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: starstruck_ and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K