Related Rates, why doesn't my solution work?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around related rates problems involving conical shapes, specifically a conical water tank and a sand pile in the shape of a cone. Participants are exploring how to correctly apply related rates to find the rates of change of volume and dimensions in these scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of treating certain variables as constants, such as the radius in the water tank problem, and the need to express relationships between variables, like height and diameter in the sand pile problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified mistakes in their reasoning related to assumptions about variable relationships. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly relate the dimensions of the cones to their rates of change. Guidance has been offered regarding implicit differentiation and the importance of substituting variables to avoid confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework problems, which may limit the information provided. There is a recognition of the need to clarify relationships between dimensions and their rates of change, particularly in cases where height and diameter are linked.

Tclack
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Conical water tank, vertex down. Radius of 10ft, 24 ft high. Water flows into tank at 20 cubic ft/ min. How fast is the depth of the water increasing at 16ft?

r=10ft
y=16ft
dV/dt=20 cubic ft/min
dy/dt=?

So here was my attempt:

V=1/3 (pi r^2) y
I treated r as a constant so I could find dv/dt in terms of dy/dt

dV/dt= 1/3 pi r^2 dy/dt
dy/dt= (dV/dt)3/(pi r^2)

I found t by taking similar triangles
10/24=r/16 so r = 10*16/24 = 20/3

I plugged in the data and got 27/20pi

The answer is: 9/20pi

Here's the actual solution:
they changed r in terms of y
r=(2/3)y

V=(1/3) (pi r^2) y substituting r gives V=(1/3) pi(2/3)^2 (y^3)=(4pi/27) y^3
dV/dt= (4pi/27)(3y^2)dy/dt

dy/dt= dV/dt * 27/[4pi(3y^2)]
plugging in 16ft for y yields: 9/20pi, the right answer

What went wrong with my solution? Both solutions seem mutually correct. They're not, but I fail to recognize what's wrong with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution assumes r is a constant. It's not. As the level of the water decreases r changes as well as y.
 
That makes sense. I think given a similar problem, I would make the same mistake.

So, next time I get a similar problem, I'll do implicit differentiation, and get the term dr/dt, I would look at my givens and see that I have no info on dr/dt, then I would go back and get rid of r (by substituting it with y) so I don't have to deal with it...

I appreciate it, thanks.
 
Another question: I'm working on a problem involving piling sand in the shape of a cone. The cone's height and diameter are always equal. The information gave that it's height is increasing at a rate of 5 ft /min at the instant when it's 10ft, I'm supposed to find the rate at which the sand is pouring onto the pile.
V=1/3 pi r^3
so dV/dt= pi (r^2)dr/dt
When I worked through it, I was stumped as to what to put down for dr/dt

it's DIAMETER is increasing at 5 ft/min, If at that moment, it were to stay at 5 ft/min, a minute later the new diameter would be 15ft. the radius went from 5ft to 7.5 ft. So It appears that the radius is increasing at 2.5 ft/min.

When I plugged in that information, I got the wrong answer. The books answer matches if you assume dr/dt=5ft/min

What's wrong with me now?
 
Tclack said:
Another question: I'm working on a problem involving piling sand in the shape of a cone. The cone's height and diameter are always equal. The information gave that it's height is increasing at a rate of 5 ft /min at the instant when it's 10ft, I'm supposed to find the rate at which the sand is pouring onto the pile.
V=1/3 pi r^3
so dV/dt= pi (r^2)dr/dt
When I worked through it, I was stumped as to what to put down for dr/dt

it's DIAMETER is increasing at 5 ft/min, If at that moment, it were to stay at 5 ft/min, a minute later the new diameter would be 15ft. the radius went from 5ft to 7.5 ft. So It appears that the radius is increasing at 2.5 ft/min.

When I plugged in that information, I got the wrong answer. The books answer matches if you assume dr/dt=5ft/min

What's wrong with me now?

The volume is V=(1/3)*pi*r^2*h. If h is equal the diameter, then h=2r. That makes the volume (2/3)*pi*r^3. Not (1/3)*pi*r^3. I think what's wrong with you is that you may need some sleep. You just aren't thinking about this very clearly.
 
Yeah I think you're right, I worked the problem again given your new information and I got the wrong answer...because in whatever screwed up mathematical system I'm using, 5^3 =625.

And I have another mystery, but I have a feeling it's not the mystery I think it is. I should look at it tomorrow after I've lain in bed with my eyes shut for 8 hours.

Thanks for your insight. ZZZ
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K