Relating the entropy of an ideal gas with partial derivatives

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on relating the entropy of an ideal gas to partial derivatives and the extensible properties of the system. Participants explore the application of Euler's homogeneous theorem to derive relationships involving energy, entropy, volume, and particle number. Key equations are presented, including the connection between entropy and energy changes, leading towards the Gibbs-Duhem equation. The importance of rewriting terms using differential relationships is emphasized for clarity in understanding these concepts. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify the mathematical framework linking thermodynamic properties.
Mayan Fung
Messages
131
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
For an ideal gas, use ##dE=TdS-PdV+\mu dN## to prove
1. ##V(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T})_{\mu} = S##
2. ##V(\frac{\partial P}{\partial \mu})_T = N##
Relevant Equations
##dE=TdS-PdV+\mu dN##
It looks very easy at first glance. However, the variable S is a variable in the given expression. I have no clue to relate the partial derivatives to entropy and the number of particles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the extensible properties of the system as variables, we know that ##E (x \lambda) = \lambda E(X)## (Homogeneous function of degree a=1), so that we can say

##x * \nabla f = a f## (Euler's homogeneous theorem), where ##x = (x_{1},x_{2},...,x_{n})## is the vector with the variables.

So that
$$S( \partial E/ \partial S ) + V ( \partial E/ \partial V)+ N (\partial E/ \partial N )= a * E$$
$$ ST - PV + N \mu = E$$

The rest i think you can go on, eventually you will get the Gibbs Duhem equation
 
  • Like
Likes Mayan Fung and etotheipi
Just to add to what @LCSphysicist wrote, first try to re-write each term on the RHS according to ##x\mathrm{d}y = \mathrm{d}(xy) - y\mathrm{d}x##.
 
Thanks! This makes me recall the fact that ##G=\mu N## and ##G=U-TS+\mu N##
 
Mayan Fung said:
Thanks! This makes me recall the fact that ##G=\mu N## and ##G=U-TS+\mu N##
Careful, it's ##G := U -TS + pV = \mu N##
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...
Thread 'Conducting Sphere and Dipole Problem'
Hi, I'm stuck at this question, please help. Attempt to the Conducting Sphere and Dipole Problem (a) Electric Field and Potential at O due to Induced Charges $$V_O = 0$$ This potential is the sum of the potentials due to the real charges (##+q, -q##) and the induced charges on the sphere. $$V_O = V_{\text{real}} + V_{\text{induced}} = 0$$ - Electric Field at O, ##\vec{E}_O##: Since point O is inside a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, the electric field there must be zero...