Relating the Gamma Constant to the absorbed dose

  • Thread starter Thread starter khary23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Gamma
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on using the gamma constant (Γ) to calculate the absorbed dose from a point source of photons. It is established that the gamma constant can be utilized to derive exposure rate (dX/dt), exposure (X), dose rate (dD/dt), and dose (D) based on the referenced NRC document. Participants emphasize the importance of the conversion fluence dose factor and recommend using ICRP Publication 119 and RadMap software for cross-verification of results, particularly in the context of validating simulations against the TG-43 protocol.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gamma constant (Γ) and its application in radiation dose calculations
  • Familiarity with conversion fluence dose factors and their units
  • Knowledge of MCNP software for radiation transport simulations
  • Awareness of TG-43 protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the NRC document on gamma constant applications for radiation dose calculations
  • Learn about the conversion fluence dose factor as defined in ICRP Publication 119
  • Explore RadMap software for dose calculation and verification
  • Review the AAPM Report #84 for updates on the TG-43 protocol
USEFUL FOR

Radiation physicists, medical physicists, and researchers involved in radiation dose calculations and validation of simulation results, particularly in brachytherapy applications.

khary23
Messages
92
Reaction score
6
It is unclear from my text. Can you use the gamma constant to find the absorbed dose for a point source of photons?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
khary23 said:
It is unclear from my text. Can you use the gamma constant to find the absorbed dose for a point source of photons?
What text is one using? What is the context?

According to this document - https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1122/ML11229A688.pdf (see slides 15-33) - one can use a gamma constant, Γ, to calculate exposure rate dX/dt and exposure, X, and subsequently dose rate, dD/dt and dose, D.
 
I am using Turner's Atoms, Radiation and radiation protection.
I want to calculate the dose per activity (Gy/Bq/hr) of a point source of photons to theoretically check an MCNP result. The only way I could see to do it so that the units work, with the exception of the m^2, is with the gamma constant.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: khary23
Are you referring to the mass attenuation coefficient?
 
no,
with H/phi factor,
with mass attenuation it is :
K (mGy/h)=5.74e-4*(mu/rho)*phi*E
same reference
 
I have not heard of the dose factor, but will look it up. What are its units?

Also edited my original post to clarify what I am doing.
 
Last edited:
the conversion fluence dose factor is in pSv.cm2
I Don't know "
gamma constant " but the "
conversion fluence dose factor" is defined in the ICRP
 
Yes, Use ICRP PUBLICATION 119.
For extra safety you can use another software like RadMap (radmap.tech) to cross check your result. It has a nice gui with a Geant4 backend and you can get a time limited free license.
 
  • #10
I assume that you want to calculate the dose in tissue due to a source within the tissue.
khary23 said:
I want to calculate the dose per activity (Gy/Bq/hr) of a point source of photons to theoretically check an MCNP result.
What MCNP result do you want to check. Your own simulation or another? Can you be more specific?
 
  • #11
KlasM said:
Yes, Use ICRP PUBLICATION 119.
For extra safety you can use another software like RadMap (radmap.tech) to cross check your result. It has a nice gui with a Geant4 backend and you can get a time limited free license.

Thank you for the suggestion. I will check it out!
 
  • #12
gleem said:
I assume that you want to calculate the dose in tissue due to a source within the tissue.

What MCNP result do you want to check. Your own simulation or another? Can you be more specific?

My own simulation. I am calculating the dose to water for a brachytherapy source to validate that it conforms to the TG-43 protocol.
 
  • #13
For your information the TG-43 report has been updated to the AAPM Report #84. I recommend you check it out.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
841
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K