Relating the Minimizing Integral to the Capacity of a Cube

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the capacitance of a cube using the minimizing integral and its relation to the capacity of the object. The capacity C is defined as the integral over the surface, specifically -∫S (∂φ/∂n) dA, where φ satisfies Laplace's equation. The goal is to establish that the capacitance of a cube is bounded by 2πa < C < 2√3πa, utilizing the volume outside the inscribing sphere and the solution to Laplace's equation. Key steps involve applying the divergence theorem and manipulating integrals to relate surface and volume integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's equation and its solutions.
  • Familiarity with surface and volume integrals in vector calculus.
  • Knowledge of the divergence theorem and its applications.
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics, particularly capacitance.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the divergence theorem in electrostatics.
  • Learn about the properties of solutions to Laplace's equation.
  • Explore the relationship between surface integrals and volume integrals in potential theory.
  • Investigate the capacitance of different geometric shapes, focusing on cubes and spheres.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students interested in electrostatics, potential theory, and the mathematical derivation of capacitance for various geometric shapes.

Mathmos6
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The capacity C of an object is the integral over its surface
[itex]-\int_S \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial n} dA[/itex],
where the potential φ(x) satisfies Laplace’s equation in the volume outside the object, [itex]\phi = 1[/itex] on S and [itex]\phi \to 0[/itex] at [itex]\infty[/itex]. Show that the capacity of a sphere of radius R is [itex]4\pi R[/itex]. (I've done that bit).

Now I need to show that the capacitance of a cube is s.t. [itex]2 \pi a < C < 2\sqrt{3} \pi a[/itex]. The hint says I need to "relate the minimizing integral (below) to the capacity. Then for the lower bound, use the volume outside the inscribing sphere and take w equal to the solution to Laplace’s equation outside the cube which is extended by w=1 in the gap between the sphere and the cube.".

Homework Equations



The 'minimising integral' is (I've proven)

[itex]\int_V |\nabla w|^2 dV \geq \int_V |\nabla u|^2 dV[/itex] where u and w are both equal to f on 'S' enclosing 'V', w has continuous first partial deriv.s and u is a solution to Laplace's equation.


The Attempt at a Solution



We know [itex]\phi[/itex] is going to be a function of (r) by symmetry, but I can't really even see how to begin the second part - relating the minimising integral to the capacity. I've played around with a number of identities to try and make the surface integral look like the volume one, but to no avail... help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right, i think I've got a little further:

So you can consider [itex]\nabla \cdot (\phi \nabla \phi) = (\nabla \phi)^2 + \phi \nabla ^2 \phi[/itex], so since [itex]\phi = 1[/itex] on the relevant surfaces, [itex]\int_S \nabla \phi \cdot n dA = \int_S \phi \nabla \phi \cdot n dA[/itex]? In which case by divergence theorem capacity = [itex]-\int_V \nabla \cdot (\phi \nabla \phi) dV = -(\int_V (\nabla \phi)^2 + \phi \nabla ^2 \phi dV)[/itex]? At which point you'd want the integral for the volume outside the insphere = integral of (volume between insphere & cube + volume outside cube)?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K