Relation between inequalities for first and second derivatives

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the first and second derivatives of a function, specifically whether the inequality f'(x) >= f'(y) implies that f''(x) >= f''(y). Participants explore conditions under which this might hold and provide counterexamples to challenge the assertion.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if f'(x) >= f'(y) implies f''(x) >= f''(y) and seeks clarification on the conditions under which this might be true.
  • Another participant argues that no such inference can be generally drawn, indicating a disagreement with the initial query.
  • A counterexample is provided involving the functions F(x) = x^2 and G(x) = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 x, demonstrating that the first derivatives can be greater while the second derivatives differ significantly.
  • Further elaboration suggests that the inequality may hold under specific bounds, but it is not universally applicable, particularly for functions that vary in complex ways, such as sine and cosine functions.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of Taylor series, comparing the relationship of the first and second derivatives to the coefficients in the series, suggesting that having the same first derivative does not guarantee the same second derivative.
  • A geometric interpretation is offered, stating that the first derivative represents slope while the second derivative represents convexity, questioning whether two functions with the same slope must also share the same convexity or concavity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are multiple competing views regarding the relationship between the first and second derivatives, with some asserting that no general inference can be made while others suggest conditions under which it might hold.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the need for specific conditions or bounds when considering the relationship between the first and second derivatives, as well as the potential for counterexamples that challenge general assumptions.

nikozm
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi,

If f'(x) >= f'(y) can we say that f''(x) >= f''(y) also holds ? And if yes under which conditions ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, no such inference can be generally drawn.
 
A simple counter example is
F(x)= x ^2
G(x)= 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 x
DF = 2x
DG= 1,000,000,000,000,000,000
D^2F = 2
D^2G= 0
For x > 500,000,000,000,000,000
nikozm said:
Hi,

If f'(x) >= f'(y) can we say that f''(x) >= f''(y) also holds ? And if yes under which conditions ?

Thanks
is not correct. For anything below those bounds it is right. The inequality you stated is only true under certain bounds because the two derivatives vary and may periodically become greater or smaller as in the sine and cosine functions. Bounds the inequality is true under need to be specified , to answer questions about the examples of the inequality you stated. Also because the derivative is a function it varies inequalities can't though and become false for certain values of the function. (The sine cosine remark serves as a good example, but I'm leaning towards arbitrary functions varying in all different manners not just varying periodically.)
 
do you know about taylor series? In that series representation of a function, the first derivative is the linear coefficient and the second derive active is (twice) the quadratic coefficient. Your question is thus sort of like asking whether two taylor writes which have the same linear coefficient must also have the same quadratic coefficient. Of course not, as the second coefficient can be anything.

Or geometrically, the first derivative measures the slope of the graph while the second derivative measures the convexity. so this is like asking whether two graphs with the same slope must also have the same convexity, or concavity at a point. can you draw a counterexample?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K