Relation Between Protons and Properties.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how variations in the number of protons in elements lead to significant differences in their properties, such as color, texture, and form. The number of protons determines the number of electrons, which, according to quantum mechanics principles like Schrödinger's equation and the exclusion principle, influences the geometry of electron shells. For instance, gold, with 79 protons, has an unfilled electron shell that allows for stronger bonding interactions, contributing to its solid state and distinctive properties. In contrast, mercury, with 80 protons, has filled electron shells that obscure the nucleus, resulting in weaker bonds and a liquid state at room temperature. Additionally, the arrangement of electron shells affects atomic radius and crystal structure, which in turn influences energy levels and the colors that elements can absorb or emit. Ultimately, the electron configuration is crucial in determining the chemical properties of elements.
ascendant
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
How does a difference in the number of protons in an element lead to such a difference in the properties (color, texture, form, etc.) of elements? I.E Gold and Mercury. This question has been driving me crazy and I would really appreciate any answers. Thank You.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Here's a sample crude line of thought.

1. The number of protons dictate the number of electrons.

2. The number of electrons, along with shroedinger's equation and the exclusion principle (Quantum Mechanics), dictate the geometry of the electron shells.

3. In gold 79, the odd number suggests there is a shell that is not filled, so the nucleus can better interact through it and make bonds with other atoms.

4. In mercury 80, the number is even, and it so happens that its particular shells better hide the nucleus from exterior atoms. Bonds are thus much weaker than with gold. In the case of mercury, so weak that it's liquid (in Xenon, so weak that it's gas).

Another line of thought :

The shells dictate the atomic radius, which largely defines crystal structure, which defines the energy levels, which define which colors can be absorbed or emitted.

The shape of electron orbitals are described by quantum mechanics, and how these orbitals define macroscopic properties is the subject of theoretical chemistry.
 
its the electrons that determine the chemical properties
 
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
Here's a sample crude line of thought.

1. The number of protons dictate the number of electrons.

2. The number of electrons, along with shroedinger's equation and the exclusion principle (Quantum Mechanics), dictate the geometry of the electron shells.

3. In gold 79, the odd number suggests there is a shell that is not filled, so the nucleus can better interact through it and make bonds with other atoms.

4. In mercury 80, the number is even, and it so happens that its particular shells better hide the nucleus from exterior atoms. Bonds are thus much weaker than with gold. In the case of mercury, so weak that it's liquid (in Xenon, so weak that it's gas).

Another line of thought :

The shells dictate the atomic radius, which largely defines crystal structure, which defines the energy levels, which define which colors can be absorbed or emitted.

The shape of electron orbitals are described by quantum mechanics, and how these orbitals define macroscopic properties is the subject of theoretical chemistry.

Your awesome thanks a bunch.
 
granpa said:
its the electrons that determine the chemical properties

yea i see that now.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top