Relation Between Protons and Properties.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how variations in the number of protons in elements lead to significant differences in their properties, such as color, texture, and form. The number of protons determines the number of electrons, which, according to quantum mechanics principles like Schrödinger's equation and the exclusion principle, influences the geometry of electron shells. For instance, gold, with 79 protons, has an unfilled electron shell that allows for stronger bonding interactions, contributing to its solid state and distinctive properties. In contrast, mercury, with 80 protons, has filled electron shells that obscure the nucleus, resulting in weaker bonds and a liquid state at room temperature. Additionally, the arrangement of electron shells affects atomic radius and crystal structure, which in turn influences energy levels and the colors that elements can absorb or emit. Ultimately, the electron configuration is crucial in determining the chemical properties of elements.
ascendant
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
How does a difference in the number of protons in an element lead to such a difference in the properties (color, texture, form, etc.) of elements? I.E Gold and Mercury. This question has been driving me crazy and I would really appreciate any answers. Thank You.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Here's a sample crude line of thought.

1. The number of protons dictate the number of electrons.

2. The number of electrons, along with shroedinger's equation and the exclusion principle (Quantum Mechanics), dictate the geometry of the electron shells.

3. In gold 79, the odd number suggests there is a shell that is not filled, so the nucleus can better interact through it and make bonds with other atoms.

4. In mercury 80, the number is even, and it so happens that its particular shells better hide the nucleus from exterior atoms. Bonds are thus much weaker than with gold. In the case of mercury, so weak that it's liquid (in Xenon, so weak that it's gas).

Another line of thought :

The shells dictate the atomic radius, which largely defines crystal structure, which defines the energy levels, which define which colors can be absorbed or emitted.

The shape of electron orbitals are described by quantum mechanics, and how these orbitals define macroscopic properties is the subject of theoretical chemistry.
 
its the electrons that determine the chemical properties
 
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
Here's a sample crude line of thought.

1. The number of protons dictate the number of electrons.

2. The number of electrons, along with shroedinger's equation and the exclusion principle (Quantum Mechanics), dictate the geometry of the electron shells.

3. In gold 79, the odd number suggests there is a shell that is not filled, so the nucleus can better interact through it and make bonds with other atoms.

4. In mercury 80, the number is even, and it so happens that its particular shells better hide the nucleus from exterior atoms. Bonds are thus much weaker than with gold. In the case of mercury, so weak that it's liquid (in Xenon, so weak that it's gas).

Another line of thought :

The shells dictate the atomic radius, which largely defines crystal structure, which defines the energy levels, which define which colors can be absorbed or emitted.

The shape of electron orbitals are described by quantum mechanics, and how these orbitals define macroscopic properties is the subject of theoretical chemistry.

Your awesome thanks a bunch.
 
granpa said:
its the electrons that determine the chemical properties

yea i see that now.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top