Relation for Kinetic energy and the lorentz factor.

[martinhiggs]

Homework Statement

I have to find a relation for kinetic energy as a function of the lorentz factor, KE(gamma). It can only depend on the lorentz factor or on a constant.

Homework Equations

E_{tot} = \gamma m_{0} c^{2}

E_{tot} = KE + m_{0}c^{2} = \sqrt{p^{2}c^{2} + m_{0}c^{4}}

\gamma = \sqrt{1 + \frac{v^{2}}{c^2}}

The Attempt at a Solution

I thought that the best place to start would be:

E_{tot} = KE +m_{0}c^{2}

KE = E_{tot} - m_{0}c^{2}

Also I know that

E_{tot} = \gamma m_{0}c^{2}

Substituting this in I get:

KE = \gamma m_{0}c^{2} - m_{0}c^{2}

I'm now not sure how to carry on, to get rid of the masses from the equation. Everything I try to do to remove them causes me to have another variable, like energy to then get rid of.

Any suggestions, pointers or help would be greatly appreciated, I've been stuck on this problem for 12 hours now!

 

[kreil]

The Lorentz Factor I know is given by,

\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}} where \beta = v/c

At any rate, aren't m0 and c just constants?

 

[diazona]

kreil's right. There has to be some property of the particle involved, like mass or energy, because otherwise what would distinguish, say, an electron from a proton? They could both have the same Lorentz factor but their kinetic energies would be vastly different.

If the problem really asks you to find an expression for the kinetic energy in terms of \gamma and fundamental constants only (like the speed of light), then you can go right back to your instructor and tell him/her that it's an impossible problem.

 

[martinhiggs]

Sorry, I meant 1/... for the Lorentz factor, typed it out wrong.

Ah, ok, I wasn't thinking of mass as a constant, I see now. Thanks!