Relationship between frequency and tension on a string

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on an experiment where a mass is added to a string to determine the relationship between fundamental frequency and mass. The user observes a linear relationship between frequency and mass, despite hints that a power relationship may exist. They are attempting to graph the data to find an exponent for calculating string tension but are confused by the high R^2 value of the linear fit compared to the logarithmic regression. There is speculation about whether the recorded fundamental frequency could be a subharmonic. The user seeks clarification on the relationship and assistance with their analysis.
errorbars
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the experiment, a mass was attached to the string. Increasing mass was added, and the fundamental frequency for each mass was determined. I am trying to create a graph from the data, but I am finding that I am getting a linear graph between f1 (fundamental frequency) and m (mass added). The goal is to use the graph to find out the exponent so I can calculate the tension in the string, etc. It was hinted that it would be a power relationship. Am I doing something wrong?

Homework Equations


V= f * wavelength

The Attempt at a Solution


I have a linear graph that has a very very high R^2 value, but the logarithmic regression line that fits, but not as well as the linear graph. Is it possible that the fundamental frequency I recorded was actually a subharmonic? I have tried graphing it as frequency (hz) vs mass (g) and frequency (hz) vs mass (kg), with frequency as the y-axis and the mass as the x-axis. Thanks for any assistance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From google books it looks like f is proportional to the sqrt of tension.
http://www.physics.ryerson.ca/sites/default/files/u3/2011/06/StandingWaves.pdf"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K