Relationship between horizontal force and friction in an exercise

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between horizontal force and friction in a physics exercise involving a mass of 20 N on a horizontal surface. The coefficients of static and kinetic friction are given as μs = 0.8 and μk = 0.6, respectively. It is established that the static friction force can reach a maximum of 16 N when the mass is stationary, while the kinetic friction force is 12 N when the mass is in motion. The participants clarify that static friction acts as a reaction force and is only equal to the applied force when the mass does not move.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static and kinetic friction coefficients (μs and μk)
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of reaction forces in physics
  • Ability to apply equations of friction: fs = μs · N and fk = μk · N
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of static versus kinetic friction in real-world applications
  • Explore the concept of frictional force as a reaction force in various scenarios
  • Learn about the effects of surface materials on friction coefficients
  • Investigate the role of tension forces in static and dynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of friction and force dynamics in physical systems.

Venturi365
Messages
12
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A mass of ##20\,\mathrm{N}## lays on a horizontal surface. The static friction coefficient and the kinetic friction coefficient are, respectively: ##\mu_{s}=0.8## and ##\mu_{k}=0.6##. A horizontal cable is tied to the mass with a constant tension ##T##. What's the friction force that acts on the block if ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## and ##T=20\,\mathrm{N}##?
Relevant Equations
##f_{s}=\mu_{s}\cdot N##
##f_{k}=\mu_{k}\cdot N##
The thing with this exercise is that I don't think that the question makes sense at all (or, at least, is incomplete).

First of all, we don't know if the mass moves with any of those tensions, therefore I cannot know which coefficient apply. Second of all, even if we suppose that the mass is moving or not, the friction force has nothing to do with any horizontal force, but rather it is related to the movement and weight of the mass. Right?

Anyway, if we suppose that in both cases the mass doesn't move, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{s}=0.8\cdot 20 =16\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

If we suppose that in both cases the mass moves, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{k}=0.6\cdot 20=12\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

Am I missing something or is it the wording of the problem just uncomplete or misleading?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Venturi365 said:
Homework Statement: A mass of ##20\,\mathrm{N}## lays on a horizontal surface. The static friction coefficient and the kinetic friction coefficient are, respectively: ##\mu_{s}=0.8## and ##\mu_{k}=0.6##. A horizontal cable is tied to the mass with a constant tension ##T##. What's the friction force that acts on the block if ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## and ##T=20\,\mathrm{N}##?
Relevant Equations: ##f_{s}=\mu_{s}\cdot N##
##f_{k}=\mu_{k}\cdot N##

The thing with this exercise is that I don't think that the question makes sense at all (or, at least, is incomplete).

First of all, we don't know if the mass moves with any of those tensions, therefore I cannot know which coefficient apply. Second of all, even if we suppose that the mass is moving or not, the friction force has nothing to do with any horizontal force, but rather it is related to the movement and weight of the mass. Right?

Anyway, if we suppose that in both cases the mass doesn't move, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{s}=0.8\cdot 20 =16\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

If we suppose that in both cases the mass moves, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{k}=0.6\cdot 20=12\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

Am I missing something or is it the wording of the problem just uncomplete or misleading?
Notice that the coefficient of static friction is larger than the kinetic. Initially the block is "laying there". In order to get it to move you must overcome the force of static friction. Once moving the frictional force coefficient sharply drops off to ##\mu_k##

Concept question: When the block is sitting there without any horizontal force applied. What is the force of friction?
 
erobz said:
Notice that the coefficient of static friction is larger than the kinetic. Initially the block is "laying there". In order to get it to move you must overcome the force of static friction. Once moving the frictional force coefficient sharply drops off to ##\mu_k##

Ohhhh, so therefore when ##T=15## then ##f\leq 16## and when ##T=20## then ##f=12##
 
Venturi365 said:
Ohhhh, so therefore when ##T=15## then ##f\leq 16##
No, you are on the right track but this statement is not correct.

When the block is sitting there without any horizontal tension force, what is the force of static friction acting on it?
 
erobz said:
When the block is sitting there without any horizontal tension force, what is the force of static friction acting on it?

Well, since the friction is a reaction force, it has to be ##f=0\,\mathrm{N}##

I guess that technically, when ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## then ##f=15\,\mathrm{N}## because there's no resulting movement and ##\mu_{s}=0.8## is just the maximum value that it could take.
 
Venturi365 said:
Well, since the friction is a reaction force, it has to be ##f=0\,\mathrm{N}##

I guess that technically, when ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## then ##f=15\,\mathrm{N}## because there's no resulting movement and ##\mu_{s}=0.8## is just the maximum value that it could take.
There you go!
 
erobz said:
There you go!

Thank you for your help!
 
Venturi365 said:
Relevant Equations: ##f_{s}=\mu_{s}\cdot N##
No. $$f_s\leq \mu_s~N##. This says that the force static friction is at most ##\mu_s~N##. Otherwise, it's whatever is necessary to provide the observed acceleration. It's like a credit card with a maximum of $2,000. When you go to a store to buy something, you can use the card to buy anything under $2,000. What you charge to the card is the price of the object, not $2,000.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
543
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K