Relationship between horizontal force and friction in an exercise

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between horizontal force and friction in a physics exercise involving a mass on a surface. Participants express confusion over the problem's wording, particularly regarding whether the mass is moving and which friction coefficient to apply. It is clarified that static friction acts as a reaction force, with its maximum value determined by the coefficient of static friction, while kinetic friction applies once the mass is in motion. The calculations show that for a tension of 15 N, the static friction force can equal 15 N, while for 20 N, the kinetic friction force is 12 N. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clarity in problem statements regarding movement and friction forces.
Venturi365
Messages
12
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A mass of ##20\,\mathrm{N}## lays on a horizontal surface. The static friction coefficient and the kinetic friction coefficient are, respectively: ##\mu_{s}=0.8## and ##\mu_{k}=0.6##. A horizontal cable is tied to the mass with a constant tension ##T##. What's the friction force that acts on the block if ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## and ##T=20\,\mathrm{N}##?
Relevant Equations
##f_{s}=\mu_{s}\cdot N##
##f_{k}=\mu_{k}\cdot N##
The thing with this exercise is that I don't think that the question makes sense at all (or, at least, is incomplete).

First of all, we don't know if the mass moves with any of those tensions, therefore I cannot know which coefficient apply. Second of all, even if we suppose that the mass is moving or not, the friction force has nothing to do with any horizontal force, but rather it is related to the movement and weight of the mass. Right?

Anyway, if we suppose that in both cases the mass doesn't move, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{s}=0.8\cdot 20 =16\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

If we suppose that in both cases the mass moves, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{k}=0.6\cdot 20=12\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

Am I missing something or is it the wording of the problem just uncomplete or misleading?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Venturi365 said:
Homework Statement: A mass of ##20\,\mathrm{N}## lays on a horizontal surface. The static friction coefficient and the kinetic friction coefficient are, respectively: ##\mu_{s}=0.8## and ##\mu_{k}=0.6##. A horizontal cable is tied to the mass with a constant tension ##T##. What's the friction force that acts on the block if ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## and ##T=20\,\mathrm{N}##?
Relevant Equations: ##f_{s}=\mu_{s}\cdot N##
##f_{k}=\mu_{k}\cdot N##

The thing with this exercise is that I don't think that the question makes sense at all (or, at least, is incomplete).

First of all, we don't know if the mass moves with any of those tensions, therefore I cannot know which coefficient apply. Second of all, even if we suppose that the mass is moving or not, the friction force has nothing to do with any horizontal force, but rather it is related to the movement and weight of the mass. Right?

Anyway, if we suppose that in both cases the mass doesn't move, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{s}=0.8\cdot 20 =16\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

If we suppose that in both cases the mass moves, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{k}=0.6\cdot 20=12\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

Am I missing something or is it the wording of the problem just uncomplete or misleading?
Notice that the coefficient of static friction is larger than the kinetic. Initially the block is "laying there". In order to get it to move you must overcome the force of static friction. Once moving the frictional force coefficient sharply drops off to ##\mu_k##

Concept question: When the block is sitting there without any horizontal force applied. What is the force of friction?
 
erobz said:
Notice that the coefficient of static friction is larger than the kinetic. Initially the block is "laying there". In order to get it to move you must overcome the force of static friction. Once moving the frictional force coefficient sharply drops off to ##\mu_k##

Ohhhh, so therefore when ##T=15## then ##f\leq 16## and when ##T=20## then ##f=12##
 
Venturi365 said:
Ohhhh, so therefore when ##T=15## then ##f\leq 16##
No, you are on the right track but this statement is not correct.

When the block is sitting there without any horizontal tension force, what is the force of static friction acting on it?
 
erobz said:
When the block is sitting there without any horizontal tension force, what is the force of static friction acting on it?

Well, since the friction is a reaction force, it has to be ##f=0\,\mathrm{N}##

I guess that technically, when ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## then ##f=15\,\mathrm{N}## because there's no resulting movement and ##\mu_{s}=0.8## is just the maximum value that it could take.
 
Venturi365 said:
Well, since the friction is a reaction force, it has to be ##f=0\,\mathrm{N}##

I guess that technically, when ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## then ##f=15\,\mathrm{N}## because there's no resulting movement and ##\mu_{s}=0.8## is just the maximum value that it could take.
There you go!
 
erobz said:
There you go!

Thank you for your help!
 
Venturi365 said:
Relevant Equations: ##f_{s}=\mu_{s}\cdot N##
No. $$f_s\leq \mu_s~N##. This says that the force static friction is at most ##\mu_s~N##. Otherwise, it's whatever is necessary to provide the observed acceleration. It's like a credit card with a maximum of $2,000. When you go to a store to buy something, you can use the card to buy anything under $2,000. What you charge to the card is the price of the object, not $2,000.
 
Back
Top