Relationship between horizontal force and friction in an exercise

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between horizontal force and friction in a scenario involving a mass on a horizontal surface. The problem presents a mass with known static and kinetic friction coefficients and asks about the friction force under different tension scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of static versus kinetic friction and question the completeness of the problem statement. They discuss the conditions under which the mass may or may not move and how this affects the friction force. Some participants attempt to calculate friction forces based on given tensions, while others question the assumptions about movement and friction force definitions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants raising questions about the problem's wording and the relationship between applied tension and friction. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of static friction and its maximum value, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem lacks clarity regarding whether the mass moves under the applied tensions, which complicates the determination of the friction force. There is also a discussion about the nature of static friction as a reaction force and its maximum value in relation to the applied tension.

Venturi365
Messages
12
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A mass of ##20\,\mathrm{N}## lays on a horizontal surface. The static friction coefficient and the kinetic friction coefficient are, respectively: ##\mu_{s}=0.8## and ##\mu_{k}=0.6##. A horizontal cable is tied to the mass with a constant tension ##T##. What's the friction force that acts on the block if ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## and ##T=20\,\mathrm{N}##?
Relevant Equations
##f_{s}=\mu_{s}\cdot N##
##f_{k}=\mu_{k}\cdot N##
The thing with this exercise is that I don't think that the question makes sense at all (or, at least, is incomplete).

First of all, we don't know if the mass moves with any of those tensions, therefore I cannot know which coefficient apply. Second of all, even if we suppose that the mass is moving or not, the friction force has nothing to do with any horizontal force, but rather it is related to the movement and weight of the mass. Right?

Anyway, if we suppose that in both cases the mass doesn't move, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{s}=0.8\cdot 20 =16\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

If we suppose that in both cases the mass moves, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{k}=0.6\cdot 20=12\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

Am I missing something or is it the wording of the problem just uncomplete or misleading?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Venturi365 said:
Homework Statement: A mass of ##20\,\mathrm{N}## lays on a horizontal surface. The static friction coefficient and the kinetic friction coefficient are, respectively: ##\mu_{s}=0.8## and ##\mu_{k}=0.6##. A horizontal cable is tied to the mass with a constant tension ##T##. What's the friction force that acts on the block if ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## and ##T=20\,\mathrm{N}##?
Relevant Equations: ##f_{s}=\mu_{s}\cdot N##
##f_{k}=\mu_{k}\cdot N##

The thing with this exercise is that I don't think that the question makes sense at all (or, at least, is incomplete).

First of all, we don't know if the mass moves with any of those tensions, therefore I cannot know which coefficient apply. Second of all, even if we suppose that the mass is moving or not, the friction force has nothing to do with any horizontal force, but rather it is related to the movement and weight of the mass. Right?

Anyway, if we suppose that in both cases the mass doesn't move, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{s}=0.8\cdot 20 =16\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

If we suppose that in both cases the mass moves, then:

$$
\begin{align}
f_{k}=0.6\cdot 20=12\,\mathrm{N}
\end{align}
$$

Am I missing something or is it the wording of the problem just uncomplete or misleading?
Notice that the coefficient of static friction is larger than the kinetic. Initially the block is "laying there". In order to get it to move you must overcome the force of static friction. Once moving the frictional force coefficient sharply drops off to ##\mu_k##

Concept question: When the block is sitting there without any horizontal force applied. What is the force of friction?
 
erobz said:
Notice that the coefficient of static friction is larger than the kinetic. Initially the block is "laying there". In order to get it to move you must overcome the force of static friction. Once moving the frictional force coefficient sharply drops off to ##\mu_k##

Ohhhh, so therefore when ##T=15## then ##f\leq 16## and when ##T=20## then ##f=12##
 
Venturi365 said:
Ohhhh, so therefore when ##T=15## then ##f\leq 16##
No, you are on the right track but this statement is not correct.

When the block is sitting there without any horizontal tension force, what is the force of static friction acting on it?
 
erobz said:
When the block is sitting there without any horizontal tension force, what is the force of static friction acting on it?

Well, since the friction is a reaction force, it has to be ##f=0\,\mathrm{N}##

I guess that technically, when ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## then ##f=15\,\mathrm{N}## because there's no resulting movement and ##\mu_{s}=0.8## is just the maximum value that it could take.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
Venturi365 said:
Well, since the friction is a reaction force, it has to be ##f=0\,\mathrm{N}##

I guess that technically, when ##T=15\,\mathrm{N}## then ##f=15\,\mathrm{N}## because there's no resulting movement and ##\mu_{s}=0.8## is just the maximum value that it could take.
There you go!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Venturi365
erobz said:
There you go!

Thank you for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
Venturi365 said:
Relevant Equations: ##f_{s}=\mu_{s}\cdot N##
No. $$f_s\leq \mu_s~N##. This says that the force static friction is at most ##\mu_s~N##. Otherwise, it's whatever is necessary to provide the observed acceleration. It's like a credit card with a maximum of $2,000. When you go to a store to buy something, you can use the card to buy anything under $2,000. What you charge to the card is the price of the object, not $2,000.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
736
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K