Relationship Between Kinetic Friction and Mechanical Energy

Click For Summary
Kinetic friction is identified as a non-conservative force that decreases the mechanical energy of a system. Static friction does not perform work, thus it does not affect the mechanical energy. The discussion highlights that friction always acts in the opposite direction to the motion of the system. However, the original homework question indicates that not all statements are correct, leading to confusion about which specific statement is incorrect. The scenarios presented, such as pushing a box or a car moving, illustrate the complexities of how friction interacts with mechanical energy.
velouria131
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Which of the following statements about friction is correct?
I. Kinetic friction always decreases the mechanical energy of a system.
II. The static friction force cannot change the mechanical energy of a system.
III. The force of friction always points in the direction opposite to the way that a system moves.
None of the statements is correct.
Statement III only
Statements I & II only
Statement II only
Statements I & III only
Statements II & III only
Statement I only.
All three statements.




Homework Equations


W = F * D
Mechanical Energy = KE + Ug


The Attempt at a Solution



I cannot find the culprit. All appear to be correct and I cannot form any counter-examples. Kinetic friction is a non-conservative force, so it must decrease the mechanical energy of a system where friction is present. Static friction does not do work, so it must not affect the mechanical energy of a system. For the third; I cannot imagine a system in which friction points in the direction of motion. Kinetic friction is caused by this motion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you think that the answer is "all of the above?"

So what's the problem? Have you been told that this answer is incorrect?
 
Exactly. All of the above was taken as incorrect by the online homework program I am using. I am now stumped as to which one is the odd problem out.
 
Hmm, okay, let's think this through.

If I push a box across a flat surface at a constant speed, is the mechanical energy of the box changing? Is kinetic friction present?
 
There would be a change in kinetic energy but no change in potential energy. When pushing a box across a floor with friction, kinetic energy is lost to the frictional force which runs parallel to the direction of motion?
 
velouria131 said:
There would be a change in kinetic energy but no change in potential energy. When pushing a box across a floor with friction, kinetic energy is lost to the frictional force which runs parallel to the direction of motion?

No, pay closer attention to the scenario I am proposing:

cepheid said:
Hmm, okay, let's think this through.

If I push a box across a flat surface at a constant speed, is the mechanical energy of the box changing? Is kinetic friction present?
 
Actually let's consider a couple of other situations:

1. Walking
2. A car moving down a road.

For situation 2, what direction does the frictional force from the road ON the tires point? What direction does the system move?

For both situations: is the friction causing the mechanical energy of the system to decrease?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K