I am reading an Abstract Algebra book, and there is a theorem that says:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Thm: If G is a finite group, then the number of elements conjugate to a is the index of the normalizer in G.

The book uses the normalizer to mean

[itex]

N(a\in G)=\{ x\in G\colon xa=ax\}

[/itex]

Now if the group is S_4, and our element is (1,2)(3,4), then the number of elements conjugate to (1,2)(3,4) is 3, and the number of elements with commute with (1,2)(3,4) is 4, so the theorem doesn't hold (???).

I am pretty sure that I am wrong, but I don't see why. Clearly the set of conjugates to (1,2)(3,4) is

[itex]

\{ (12)(34), (13)(24), (14)(23) \}

[/itex]

and the normalizer is

[itex]

\{ (12), (34), (12)(34), e\}

[/itex]

What am I missing??

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Relationship between size of conjugacy class and the normalizer?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Relationship between size | Date |
---|---|

Relationship between inverse matrix and inertia tensor? | Apr 18, 2015 |

Relationship between linear (in)dependency and span | Sep 17, 2014 |

Relationship between orbits and cosets | Nov 15, 2012 |

Is this theorem true? Relationship between linear functionals and inner products | Aug 11, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**