Relationship betwen homotopy groups?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Relationship
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the homotopy groups of a pair (X, A) and the homotopy groups of the quotient space X/A, particularly in the context where X is a smooth manifold and A is a submanifold. Participants explore various conditions and implications related to this relationship.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that there may be a relationship between the homotopy groups of (X, A) and X/A under certain mild hypotheses.
  • Another participant notes that while the intuition may hold in homology, they are unsure how it translates to homotopy theory.
  • A question is raised regarding the definition of homotopy of a pair, specifically whether it refers to homotopy classes of maps of cubes or disks with boundaries contained in A.
  • There is a mention of a fibration condition, where a participant speculates that if the quotient map is a fibration, it might lead to an isomorphism of homotopy groups.
  • Concerns are expressed about the delicacy of the relationship depending on the nature of the submanifold A within X.
  • One participant references the case of a closed subgroup of a Lie group, suggesting that the relationship may not hold for all submanifolds.
  • A participant provides information about fiber bundles and conditions under which a quotient space forms a fiber bundle, citing examples from topology.
  • Another participant retracts their earlier statements, expressing uncertainty about the implications of fiber maps for Lie groups.
  • A counterexample is presented, where both X and A are spheres, leading to unchanged homotopy groups for (X, A) while X/A collapses to a single point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty and explore multiple competing views regarding the relationship between the homotopy groups of (X, A) and X/A. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the conditions under which such a relationship may hold.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the relationship may depend on specific conditions related to the submanifold A and the nature of the quotient map, which are not fully established in the discussion.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Is there a relationship between the homotopy groups of a pair (X,A) and of the quotient X/A ? It feels like they should be equal under mild hypothesis.

More precisely, I am interested in the case where X is a smooth manifold and A a submanifold.

Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know much homotopy theory, but your intuition is correct in homology: The homology of X/A is isomorphic to the homology of the pair (X,A) provided there is an open neighborhood of A in X that deformation retracts to A.

I apologize for not answering your question if you already knew that.
 
Last edited:
By homotopy of a pair, do you mean homotopy classes of maps of cubes, or disks, which have their boundaries contained in A?

I could imagine that your intuition is correct, given certain conditions.

I did notice that if p :E \rightarrow B is a fibration with fibre F, then
p_* : \pi_n (E,F,f_0 ) \rightarrow \pi_n (B,b_0)

is an isomorphism. So maybe you just need that the quotient map is a fibration, which it is in your case isn't it?
 
I don't know. Is it? It looks that way though.
 
Last edited:
Actually, I'm not 100%, I think that it will probably vary very delicately on the submanifold.

I know that if you have a closed subgroup (H, say) of a Lie group (G, say) then H is a submanifold of G and G-->G/H is a fibre bundle (and hence a fibration).

So this obviously wouldn't have been formulated if it worked for all submanifolds.

I guess that this won't be too helpful then, unless your submanfold sits "nicely" inside your other manifold :frown:
 
Maybe this is helpful for you, from the wiki page for fibre bundles:

Quotient spaces

If G is a topological group and H is a closed subgroup, then under some circumstances, the quotient space G/H together with the quotient map π : G → G/H is a fiber bundle, whose fiber is the topological space H. A necessary and sufficient condition for (G,G/H,π,H) to form a fiber bundle is that the mapping π admit local cross-sections (Steenrod & 1951 §7).

The most general conditions under which the quotient map will admit local cross-sections are not known, although if G is a Lie group and H a closed subgroup (and thus a Lie subgroup by Cartan's theorem), then the quotient map is a fiber bundle. One example of this is the Hopf fibration, S3 → S2 which is a fiber bundle over the sphere S2 whose total space is S3. From the perspective of Lie groups, S3 can be identified with the special unitary group SU(2). The abelian subgroup of diagonal matrices is isomorphic to the circle group U(1), and the quotient SU(2)/U(1) is diffeomorphic to the sphere.

More generally, if G is any topological group and H a closed subgroup which also happens to be a Lie group, then G → G/H is a fiber bundle.
 
Sorry, ignore everything I am saying, I am being an idiot.

The fibre map for Lie groups makes more identifications than the one you gave, it is the coset space.

Sorry about that ^^
 
Just as a quick counter example, X could be the sphere, A the sphere as well, so that the homotopy groups are unchanged for (X,A) but X/A is the single point set, maybe this is more helpful :D
 
Heh, thanks Jamma.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K