Relationship of Physical Quantities in Functions

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics lab assignment requiring the creation of graphs from data tables and determining the relationships between variables. The participant graphed reactance against frequency and initially suspected a non-exponential relationship. After testing logarithmic scales, they identified a power function with an exponent of approximately -1 and a coefficient around 4.492, yielding reasonable predictions for specific data points. The second data table was confirmed to be linear, while the third table suggested another power function, indicating that none of the datasets exhibited an exponential relationship.
Youngster
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is actually a part of my physics lab assignment, but there isn't any physics involved here, so I chose to post this here. I hope that isn't a problem.

Anyway, I've been given three data tables, and have been asked to make graphs for each of the data tables by hand. After doing so, I'm tasked to find the function for each graph, also being tasked with finding the relationships between the values that compose the function.

Here is one of those tables:

0QXs1.png


Homework Equations



For linear functions: y = Bx + A
For power functions: log y = n log x + log A
For exponential functions: ln y = Bx + ln A

The Attempt at a Solution



I did actually graph the data first, with reactance as my independent variable (in the x-axis) and frequency as my dependent variable, and I'm guessing it's not an exponential function, just based on appearance.

OMNdp.png


I then tried plugging in my y values into power function equation, but I don't know how to derive the exponent n, or the coefficient A from that equation (assuming a power function relationship even exists in this case).

I'm hoping to get some direction here, so I can start on the other two data sets that I've also graphed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint -- what does it look like if you make the horizontal axis logarithmic?
 
Okay, just tried that and got a (nearly) straight line with a slope around -1.

So -1 would be n, and A (after some further calculation) would be about 4.492.

Plugged those into check so that at x = 100, y = 310.7, and at x = 200, y = 155.34. These are pretty close, and sound reasonable when factoring in uncertainty. Thanks a lot!

Okay, I also managed to do the second one, but I need some clarification (and maybe help) with the last data table.

ygU6T.png


The energy given by GeV is the independent variable here, yes?
 
Youngster said:
The energy given by GeV is the independent variable here, yes?

Yes. What does the graph look like?
 
Alright, the graph looks like this:

vrrvl.png


And I was thinking this was an exponential function, but when I took the logarithm of both sides, I got another (somewhat) straight line

1DE3O.png


So I'm guessing it's another power function since the natural log of the dependent variable does not form a straight line.

Plugging the values in, I again receive values pretty close to what should be expected. I suppose none of the data tables given provide an exponential function (the second one was linear when graphed).

Thanks a lot, I appreciate the help.
 
Good work!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K