Relative Angular Momentum in 2 Body Decay at Detector Level

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the detection of relative angular momentum in two-particle decay within the center of mass frame. Key insights include the role of spherical harmonics functions Y^m_{l} in determining the angular momentum quantum number L, with L=0 being independent of the angle θ and L=1 exhibiting a specific dependence on θ. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in calculating partial decay widths and emphasizes the importance of understanding the differences in angular momentum states for accurate theoretical predictions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of two-particle decay processes
  • Familiarity with spherical harmonics functions Y^m_{l}
  • Knowledge of angular momentum quantum numbers
  • Basic principles of particle physics and detector technology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of spherical harmonics in quantum mechanics
  • Study the methods for calculating partial decay widths in particle physics
  • Explore the significance of angular momentum in particle decay signatures
  • Investigate advanced detector technologies used in particle physics experiments
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in experimental physics, and students studying decay processes and angular momentum in quantum mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

Naeem Anwar
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
How the relative angular momentum of two particles can be detect by detector in two particle decay (center of mass frame)? I am curious about the signatures/differentiation between different relative momenta, means how one can decide that it is L=0, L=1,2,3,...?

Of course the distribution would be different, but what kind of difference exist exactly? Looking for some pictorial spirit to understand the difference.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it has to do with the spherical harmonics functions Y^m_{l}.
There will be some particular dependence on the \theta coordinate and this will help you find the L.
http://www.trinnov.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/sphericalHarm.jpg

For example an L=0 particle will be independent from \theta= - \pi to \pi (or \cos \theta \in [-1,1].
An L=1 will have some particular dependence on theta..

I don't know maybe there are other more effective ways to do that in a detector.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Naeem Anwar
Ok got it. Thanks!

But in theoretical calculation I am not clear what is the major difference I should have to keep in mind in calculating these partial decay widths. I know in the final result there must be projection on some Y^m_{l} but I am not able to get the difference from start. Do you have any idea?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K