Relative Speeds and the Limit of Light

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nu_paradigm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the implications of relative speeds approaching the speed of light (c) and challenges the conventional understanding of speed limits in physics. The user proposes a scenario where traveling at slightly more than c/2 relative to a stationary mirror could lead to a perceived speed greater than c when viewing one's image. The conversation emphasizes that while mass-bearing objects cannot reach c, the concept of speed measurement between points is critical, as demonstrated through the Lorentz transformation. The discussion concludes that relative speeds do not simply add up to exceed c, reinforcing established physics principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Basic knowledge of time dilation concepts
  • Awareness of phase velocity in wave mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Einstein's theory of special relativity in detail
  • Learn about Lorentz transformations and their applications
  • Research phase velocity and its implications in physics
  • Examine scenarios involving relative motion and speed limits
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the nuances of speed and relativity in the context of modern physics.

nu_paradigm
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Relative speeds reaching c??

Just an idea...

Suppose i am traveling at the speed of slightly more than c/2 with respect to ground and there is a stationary plane mirror in which i can view myself approaching the mirror. Now won't my relative speed with respect to my image be more than c??
Since time dilation would be equal for me and my image... so can i violate the law that speed of c cannot be attained??

Similarly if i am traveling at slightly more than c/2 and pass someone going in the opposite direction at the same speed as me... again will i view him going at speed over c??

I know attaining speed of c/2 is highly improbable... but if this is overlooked... is this hypothesis possible??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one ever said that c cannot be obtained. They only said it cannot be obtained by things that have mass. Your image has no mass. It's no different than if you had a beacon of light that could be seen at 1 light second, then rotating whatever is emitting the beam at faster than 1 cycle per second. The light would appear to be traveling along the circumference of the 1 light second radius circle at a speed of pi*c. Google phase velocity and you'll see what I mean.
 
This is a variation of the idea of two ships moving away from a central point at .5C - do they add to 1C? The answer is no, they don't. Speed is something you measure between two points, not between 3. The center point could say that the ships have a "separation speed" of 1C, but that doesn't mean they measure their own speed relative to each other to be 1C - for that you still need the Lorentz equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
724
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K