Relativistic CM frame Kinetic energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a relativistic collision problem involving two identical spheres in their center of mass (CM) frame. The original poster is tasked with calculating the speed of the spheres in the CM frame, given that their CM frame kinetic energy equals their rest energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the speed using a specific formula, arriving at a value of (root3/2)c. Some participants question the applicability of their methods in the CM frame and seek clarification on the underlying principles.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging with the problem, with some confirming the original poster's calculated speed while others are exploring the reasoning behind the methods used. There is an ongoing dialogue about the application of formulas in different inertial frames.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the application of certain methods in the CM frame, indicating a need for clarification on relativistic principles and energy calculations.

Bigfoots mum
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Now then, this is a past paper question for only 3 marks but its annoying me.

2 identical spheres undergoing an elastic relativistic collision. The spheres move with a speed such that their CM frame kinetic energy is equal to their rest energy. Calculate the speed the spheres in the CM frame.
Not entirely sure about this, i took the obvious option and calculated (root3/2)c as my speed.

Any ideas?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Bigfoots mum! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ :wink:)
Bigfoots mum said:
… Not entirely sure about this, i took the obvious option and calculated (root3/2)c as my speed.

Yes, that's the right answer :-p

but how did you get it? :confused:
 
I used Kinetic Energy T = E - mc^2

where E is the total particle energy and mc^2 is the rest energy. Therefore gamma is 2, and we're away with the mixer.
I just wasnt sure if this method would apply in the CM frame, but then I am not sure why it wouldnt!
Thanks for the response
 
Bigfoots mum said:
I just wasnt sure if this method would apply in the CM frame, but then I am not sure why it wouldnt!

All your favourite formulas apply in any inertial frame. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K