Relativistic Collision - Momentum and Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relativistic collision of two rocks, each with a mass of 1.00 kg, moving at velocities of 0.800c and 0.750c in opposite directions. The calculated velocity of the combined mass after the collision is approximately 0.0627c, but participants noted discrepancies with homework site answers. The method used for calculation, involving momentum and energy conservation principles, is confirmed as correct, but sensitivity to initial velocity values leads to a range of possible outcomes between 0.061c and 0.064c.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic momentum and energy conservation
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations and gamma factors
  • Basic knowledge of hyperbolic functions and their application in relativistic physics
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Lorentz transformations in collision scenarios
  • Learn about hyperbolic functions and their relevance in relativistic physics
  • Explore the concept of Minkowski diagrams for visualizing relativistic events
  • Investigate the effects of rounding and precision in relativistic calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding relativistic collisions and the nuances of momentum and energy conservation in high-velocity scenarios.

Eve Torchic
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Two chunks of rock, each having a mass of 1.00 kg, collide in space. Just before the collision, an observer at rest in the reference frame of a nearby star determines that rock A is moving toward the star at 0.800 c and rock B is moving away from the star at 0.750 c .

If the rocks stick together after the collision, what is their velocity (in the reference frame of the star) immediately after the collision? Consider the direction away from the star to be the positive direction.

Attempt at solution:

p for momentum
v for velocity
m for mass

Momentum:
PAB = PA+PB
ϒABmABvAB = ϒAmAvA + ϒBmBvB

Energy:
ETotal = EA + EB
ϒABmABc^2 = ϒAmAc^2 + ϒBmBc^2

divide c^2
ϒABmAB = ϒAmA + ϒBmB

When dividing momentum by energy, the mass and Lorentz factors cancel to leave the velocity of AB
vAB = (ϒAmAvA + ϒBmBvB) / (ϒAmA + ϒBmB)

substituting the numbers and
mA = 1 kg
mB = 1 kg
vA = 0.800c
vB = 0.750c

I got
vAB = 0.776c

but the answer seems to be wrong. I have no idea where to start in answering this question.

Edit: I tried changing the gamma symbols to make them the same, hope it worked.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The masses are moving in opposite directions.
 
Orodruin said:
The masses are moving in opposite directions.
oh, but is the method correct?

edit: if velocity A is negative the answer would be -0.0627c and its still the wrong answer so there seems to be a problem with my method
 
Last edited:
Your method looks fine. I got the same answer you did.
 
vela said:
Your method looks fine. I got the same answer you did.
The homework site I'm using says I got the answer wrong.
 
If you got the answer "wrong", it might be that it's the positive value 0.0627c by letting ##v_1=0.8## and ##v_2=-0.75##.

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/.../(m1*cosh(arctanh(v1))+m2*cosh(arctanh(v2)));

Since the input masses are equal, they drop out of the ratio to find the velocity of the output particle.
Geometrically, it turns out that the output particle is along the Minkowski-angle bisector:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=m1:=1;m2:=1;v1:=.8;v2:=-.75;tanh(+(arctanh(v1)+arctanh(v2))/2)
 
robphy said:
If you got the answer "wrong", it might be that it's the positive value 0.0627c by letting ##v_1=0.8## and ##v_2=-0.75##.

I tried 0.0627 and it still says I have the answer wrong. I only have 2 attempts left. Could it be a rounding problem?
 
Eve Torchic said:
I tried 0.0627 and it still says I have the answer wrong. I only have 2 attempts left. Could it be a rounding problem?

I put your figures into a spreadsheet and found that the answer is sensitive to small changes in the initial velocities. Technically, ##0.800c## could be anywhere in the range ##0.7995c - 0.8005c## and likewise ##0.750c## is in the range ##0.7495c - 0.7505c##.

If you do the calculations for the two extremes. First, using ##0.8005c## and ##0.7495c## gives an answer of ##0.064c##. And, using ##0.7995c## and ##0.7505c## gives an answer of ##0.061c##.

Technically, therefore, the answer is in the range ##0.061c - 0.064c##, hence ##0.06c## is the best you can say.

That said, it's entirely possible that the expected answer is ##0.063c##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K