Relativistic Mass and Energy Convservation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between relativistic mass, energy conservation, and gravitational effects. Participants explore how relativistic energy and gravitational potential energy may influence the mass and weight of objects in different gravitational contexts, including complex gravitational systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether relativistic energy contributes to gravitational pull and if accelerating bodies under gravity gain mass, thereby affecting their weight and acceleration.
  • There is a proposal that gravitational potential energy (GPE) may also contribute to an object's effective mass, raising the question of whether an object's position in space affects its weight.
  • One participant argues that while GPE exists for an object between two massive bodies, the mass gain associated with GPE applies to the system as a whole rather than to individual objects.
  • Another participant notes that all forms of energy, including gravitational potential energy and even dark energy, contribute to gravitational attraction, suggesting that an object's weight can vary with its position in a gravitational field.
  • Concerns are raised about the naive application of relativistic mass in gravitational equations, emphasizing the complexity of the Stress-Energy tensor and its components.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the contributions of relativistic energy and gravitational potential energy to mass and weight, with no consensus reached on these complex interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful consideration of definitions and the implications of energy conservation in gravitational systems, indicating that the discussion involves unresolved mathematical and conceptual nuances.

ryuunoseika
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Does relativistic energy contribute to gravitational 'pull'?

If so, then does the acceleration of a body being 'pulled' by gravity cause it to increase in mass, thus weighing more and accelerating even faster? Does an object have greater mass because it's original mass pulled it toward another body?

If kinetic energy counts as energy, contributing to relativistic mass, then does potential, as in gravitational potential energy? Does a body's mere position in space make it weigh more?

If all of this is true, then what happens when a body is suspended between two gravitational bodies? What's it's potential energy then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, the third question answered the second and i just noticed it, but the fourth remains.

What happens when potential energy is nullified through complex gravitational systems?
 
In the example you gave of an object between two massive objects the GPE is still there. The object has the potential to fall towards either mass, thus they have GPE. You should remember that the mass gain with GPE is for the system as a whole. In other words lifting a mass won't increase its mass, but will increase the total mass of the system as a whole when observed from far away. Another note is that energy is still conserved in all this. Whatever additional energy a system has in GPE it gain from whatever force separated the two masses in the first place.
 
ryuunoseika said:
Does relativistic energy contribute to gravitational 'pull'?
Energy is the 0,0 component of the Stress-Energy tensor, which is the source of gravity. However, there are 9 other independent components. So you can't just naiively calculate the "relativistic mass" and stick that in the Schwarzschild solution to gain any insight.
 
If kinetic energy counts as energy, contributing to relativistic mass, then does potential, as in gravitational potential energy? Does a body's mere position in space make it weigh more?

ALL forms of energy contribute to gravitational attraction, even dark energy, whatever it is. For example a coiled spring (higher PE) at a given height from the center of the Earth theoretically weighs more than when uncoiled (lower PE).

Of course the position of an object in space causes it to weigh more or less...W = Mg.
A lead weight is heaver at the Earth's surface than it is at an elevation of,say, one mile above the Earth's surface.

The GPE of a body is the work done against gravity in displacing the particle from a reference position to its given position. The reference position will typically be zero at an infinite distance from a body, and NEGATIVE closer to the body since gravity attracts. This has almost no effect on weight since the force gravity varies so much faster than the potential energy of a particle/body or whatever.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K