Relativistic Speed Travel: What is the Effective Speed?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of effective speed in the context of relativistic travel, particularly focusing on the implications of traveling vast distances at speeds approaching the speed of light. Participants explore the terminology associated with effective speed, the feasibility of interstellar journeys, and the implications of relativity on such travels.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the term for effective speed defined as ##\frac{d}{\tau}##, acknowledging the mixing of reference frames.
  • Another participant suggests that the term might be "celerity" or "proper velocity," expressing a preference against the latter.
  • There is a discussion about whether celerity is bounded, with one participant asserting it is not, implying that finite distances could be traveled within a lifetime if sufficient acceleration is achieved.
  • One participant speculates that advanced aliens could potentially visit Earth without needing warp drives, provided they can achieve necessary acceleration.
  • Another participant clarifies that the challenge lies not in acceleration but in sustaining sufficient speed over time, emphasizing the importance of thrust relative to fuel mass.
  • There is a debate about the implications of relativity for superadvanced aliens, with one participant noting that while they could travel far, returning home would involve significant time passage on their home planet.
  • Concerns are raised about the willingness of individuals to undertake long-duration space missions, comparing potential journeys to Mars versus extrasolar planets.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of length contraction, suggesting that as speed approaches c, the perceived distance to a destination diminishes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the feasibility of interstellar travel and the implications of relativity, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations related to the assumptions of acceleration, the definitions of terms like celerity, and the unresolved technical challenges associated with relativistic travel.

Smattering
Messages
170
Reaction score
21
Dear all,

Let's assume I was planning an interstellar journey with relativistic speed. Being at rest on earth, the distance to the destination is ##d##. Let's further denote the proper time I will need to reach the destination as ##\tau##.

Is there an official term for the effective speed ##\frac{d}{\tau}##?

I understand that this mixes up measures from two different frames of reference, but still the traveller who is planning his trip can reach the destination with distance ##d## within proper time ##\tau##, right?

Edit: Fixed a typo.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
DaleSpam said:
I think it is called celerity or sometimes proper velocity (which I don't like). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_velocity

Thanks a lot. That seems to be what I was looking for.

Just to be sure: This celerity is not bounded, is it? So in principle, I could reach travel every finite distance within my lifetime, given that I can achieve the necessary acceleration?
 
Correct. It is not bounded. As the velocity approaches c relative to some frame the celerity approaches infinity relative to that same frame.
 
Hm ... then advanced aliens from a distant star system would actually not need any kind of warp drive, multi generation spaceships or hypersleep chambers to visit us. The only thing they needed would be some kind of space drive that allows them to achieve the necessary acceleration.
 
Smattering said:
Hm ... then advanced aliens from a distant star system would actually not need any kind of warp drive, multi generation spaceships or hypersleep chambers to visit us. The only thing they needed would be some kind of space drive that allows them to achieve the necessary acceleration.
Not acceleration but speed. We've already achieved plenty more than enough acceleration but cannot sustain it long enough to reach sufficient speed. It all comes down to how much thrust (magnitude and duration) you can get per unit mass of fuel, and of course the mass of the spaceship.
 
Vitro said:
Not acceleration but speed. We've already achieved plenty more than enough acceleration but cannot sustain it long enough to reach sufficient speed. It all comes down to how much thrust (magnitude and duration) you can get per unit mass of fuel, and of course the mass of the spaceship.

You are right. What I meant is "the necessary acceleration for the required amount of time".

But to come back to the previous point: Relativity is actually not preventing superadvanced aliens from interstellar journeys within their lifespan, is it?
 
Smattering said:
You are right. What I meant is "the necessary acceleration for the required amount of time".

But to come back to the previous point: Relativity is actually not preventing superadvanced aliens from interstellar journeys within their lifespan, is it?

No. But it stops them getting back home. In principle, you could travel as far as the technology would allow in your lifetime, but if you travel 100 light years, then at least 100 years must have passed on your home planet (and 200 years by the time you get home).
 
PeroK said:
No. But it stops them getting back home. In principle, you could travel as far as the technology would allow in your lifetime, but if you travel 100 light years, then at least 100 years must have passed on your home planet (and 200 years by the time you get home).

That's clear. But look how many volunteers applied for the Mars One project. And that seems not only to be a one way trip but also a suicide mission.
 
  • #10
Smattering said:
That's clear. But look how many volunteers applied for the Mars One project. And that seems not only to be a one way trip but also a suicide mission.

And Mars is 10-20 light minutes away!
 
  • #11
PeroK said:
And Mars is 10-20 light minutes away!

If I had to choose between a one way trip that leads me to a camp of tents on Mars and a one way trip that leads me to an extrasolar planet with intelligent life, I would probably not choose Mars.
 
  • #12
Smattering said:
If I had to choose between a one way trip that leads me to a camp of tents on Mars and a one way trip that leads me to an extrasolar planet with intelligent life, I would probably not choose Mars.

I doubt you'll ever be faced with that choice.
 
  • #13
Smattering said:
Y
But to come back to the previous point: Relativity is actually not preventing superadvanced aliens from interstellar journeys within their lifespan, is it?

Well there are some fairly major technical "issues" that need solving, but it's a fascinating idea. Have you read about the Relativistic Rocket?
The final paragraph is a bit of a downer . . .
 
  • #14
Smattering said:
So in principle, I could reach travel every finite distance within my lifetime, given that I can achieve the necessary acceleration?

But you don't need to look at that ratio to understand that. All you need to understand is length contraction. As your speed approaches c, the distance to your destination approaches zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
951
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K