A Relativistically invariant 2-body phase space integral

George Wu
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
I encounter a function that I don‘t know in the calculation of Relativistically invariant 2-body phase space integral
I encounter a function that I don‘t know in the calculation of Relativistically invariant 2-body phase space integral:
1684333571500.png

in this equation, ##s##is the square of total energy of the system in the center-of-mass frame(I think)
I don't know what the function ##\lambda^{\frac{1}{2}}## is.
There are more equations involving this function:
P$3{FTJ%2Z0E4A%)9[BD%[C.png

I just want to know if anyone knows which textbook these equations come from, or what the function ##\lambda^{\frac{1}{2}}## is.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any reference for those 2 screenshots? A book, some lecture notes we could have access to. Otherwise, I can't recall any special function in mathematics with that notation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
826
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top