Relativity and Distance Measurement in Physics | PF Community Discussion

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter moonman239_2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurement Position
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of relativity on distance measurement, particularly how observers in different frames of reference perceive distances and the effects of traveling at speeds close to that of light. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects of special relativity, including time dilation and the relativity of simultaneity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how a traveling observer can accurately calculate distance when they perceive it differently than a stationary observer, suggesting a potential conflict in measurements.
  • Another participant argues that the traveling observer actually perceives the object as closer, not further away, and explains that both observers can use radar methods to measure distances consistently within their own frames.
  • A third participant challenges the initial claim about distance perception, emphasizing the importance of understanding the relativity of simultaneity and suggesting a focus on foundational concepts like Lorentz transformations before delving into time dilation and length contraction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how distance is perceived by observers in relative motion, with no consensus reached on the accuracy of the initial claim regarding distance measurement in relativity.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity in understanding the principles of relativity, indicating that misconceptions may hinder comprehension of the topic. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of how measurements are made in different inertial frames.

moonman239_2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello PF members!

First of all, let me start off my post by admitting that I have created a duplicate account. My original account was banned for a good reason.
Now, I am studying physics. More specifically, I'm studying relativity. I trust that you all will help me understand what I am studying.

Anyways, I have a question. Einstein said that the speed of light is the same, no matter where you are or how quickly you are moving. However, due to the effect that velocity has on time, an observer traveling near the speed of light will think that another object is further away than it actually is. Because of this, he will disagree with a stationary observer on how far he actually is from the object. So how can the traveling observer calculate his actual distance correctly? Or is space-time set up such that the both calculations are correct, if you know what I mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moonman239_2 said:
Hello PF members!

First of all, let me start off my post by admitting that I have created a duplicate account. My original account was banned for a good reason.
Now, I am studying physics. More specifically, I'm studying relativity. I trust that you all will help me understand what I am studying.

Anyways, I have a question. Einstein said that the speed of light is the same, no matter where you are or how quickly you are moving. However, due to the effect that velocity has on time, an observer traveling near the speed of light will think that another object is further away than it actually is. Because of this, he will disagree with a stationary observer on how far he actually is from the object. So how can the traveling observer calculate his actual distance correctly? Or is space-time set up such that the both calculations are correct, if you know what I mean?
An observer traveling in a frame at near the speed of light will think that another object is closer than the frame says it is, not further.

Basically, according to SR, each observer uses radar methods to establish distances and assigns the time of the measurement to the average of when the radar pulse was sent and received. This results in a consistent method of measurement and allows each observer to construct a frame of everything out there, although each frame will be different but there is no way to say that one of them is actually correct and the others actually not correct, so yes, both are correct.
 
moonman239_2 said:
Einstein said that the speed of light is the same, no matter where you are or how quickly you are moving. However, due to the effect that velocity has on time, an observer traveling near the speed of light will think that another object is further away than it actually is. Because of this, he will disagree with a stationary observer on how far he actually is from the object. So how can the traveling observer calculate his actual distance correctly? Or is space-time set up such that the both calculations are correct, if you know what I mean?

You will get nowhere in studying relativity if you do not clearly understand that the bolded text above is wrong. One way to see this is to consider that right now, even as we speak, you are moving at .99c relative to some observer somewhere - but does this mean that you think your desk is farther away from you "than it actually is"? Of course not.

You need to back up, try to forget everything that think you know about time dilation and length contract contraction. Study and understand Einstein's train experiment about the relativity of simultaneity, then the Lorentz transformations; only after that should you think about time dilation and length contraction, and you should do so by deriving them from the lorentz transforms.
 
Thread locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K