Relativity says that there is no absolute simultaneity. Quantum

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the apparent conflict between the principles of relativity, which asserts that there is no absolute simultaneity, and quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of entanglement. Participants express confusion regarding how these two foundational theories of physics interact and whether they can be reconciled.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that relativity denies absolute simultaneity, while quantum mechanics, through entanglement, seems to imply it, leading to confusion.
  • Another participant suggests that causality is not necessary in entanglement as long as the results are consistent, referencing the delayed choice quantum eraser as a thought-provoking example.
  • A participant emphasizes that many leading physicists are struggling to reconcile relativity and quantum mechanics, indicating that the incompatibilities extend beyond simultaneity and may lead to infinities when combined.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the confusion surrounding the reconciliation of relativity and quantum mechanics, with multiple competing views remaining unresolved regarding their compatibility.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations in understanding the relationship between these two theories, including unresolved mathematical implications and the dependence on specific definitions of simultaneity and causality.

cometraza
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Relativity says that there is no absolute simultaneity. Quantum mechanics with its entanglement seems to imply absolute simultaneity. And in between these two I am the one who gets confused. :smile: :confused:
Please Help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


cometraza said:
in between these two I am the one who gets confused.

You are not alone. The greatest minds in the world are trying and failing to reconcile these two theories, upon whose pillars most of modern physics stands.

It doesn't end with simultaneity. There are other ways the two are incompatible. Combining them results in infinities.
 


DaveC426913 said:
You are not alone. The greatest minds in the world are trying and failing to reconcile these two theories, upon whose pillars most of modern physics stands.

Thanks for the assurance. :rolleyes:
I thought someone has an answer which I need to know.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Understanding the historical shift away from absolute simultaneity
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Undergrad Relativity of simultaneity in actuality
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
High School What is the essence of the ladder paradox in relativity?
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
High School Help understanding the Relativity of Simultaneity
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Undergrad A thought experiment on simultaneity
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Undergrad Is Simultaneity Absolute or Relative in the Theory of Relativity?
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Undergrad Why doesn't relativity of simultaneity lead to a contradiction?
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
High School Events vs Effect of Events in Relativity of Simultaneity
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
High School Relativistic simultaneity and effects on time
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
950
High School A question about relativity of simultaneity
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
10K