Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the Remainder Estimate for the Integral Test applied to the series $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{{n}^{1.01}}$$. Participants express confusion regarding the application of series approximations and the estimation of errors involved in their calculations.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express confusion about the series and seek validation of their approach to the problem.
- One participant introduces the Laurent series expansion and suggests that for $s$ close to 1, the dominant term can be approximated, leading to a rough estimate of $\zeta(1.01) \sim 100.577...$
- Another participant critiques the use of the Laurent series, emphasizing the need to apply the Remainder Estimate for Integral Test instead, and points out errors in the initial calculations.
- It is noted that the integral approximation for $R_n$ should be computed correctly, with bounds established for $R_n$ based on integrals of the function $f(x) = \frac{1}{x^{1.01}}$.
- One participant provides a detailed explanation of how to estimate $R_n$ using integrals and suggests that the correct approximation for $s$ should yield $s \approx 100.65$.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to the problem. There are competing views on the use of the Laurent series versus the Remainder Estimate for Integral Test, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method for estimating the series.
Contextual Notes
Some participants mention specific values and approximations that may depend on the accuracy of integral calculations, and there are indications of potential errors in earlier claims about the series' sum and remainder estimates.