Renormalization differential equation ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between renormalized quantities (m_R, q_R, G_R(x,s)) and their free theory counterparts (m_0, q_0, G_0(x,s)) in the context of perturbation theory. The author inquires about the existence of a partial differential equation (PDE) or ordinary differential equation (ODE) that connects these quantities, particularly in non-renormalizable theories. The conversation highlights the challenges of trusting perturbation theory at large energy scales and the implications of beta functions derived from perturbative methods. The author seeks clarity on the derivation of the renormalization group equation and its limitations regarding non-renormalizable theories.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perturbation theory in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with renormalization concepts and beta functions
  • Knowledge of partial differential equations (PDE) and ordinary differential equations (ODE)
  • Experience with effective field theories and energy scale considerations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the renormalization group equation
  • Explore the implications of beta functions in non-renormalizable theories
  • Investigate the role of momentum cut-offs in quantum field theory
  • Learn about effective field theories and their validity at low energy scales
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, as well as researchers exploring the intricacies of renormalization and perturbation methods.

tpm
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Renormalization differential equation ??

Let's suppose we have in perturbation theory the quantities

(m_0 , q_0 , G_0 (x,s))

With m,q, and G(x,s) the 'mass' 'charge' and 'Green function' (propagator)

and the sub-index '0' here stands for "free" theory (no interactions)

Then my question is if there is a PDE , ODE or similar that relates the 'renormalized' (finite values) of the interacting theory

(m_R , q_R , G_R (x,s)) (R=renormalization) and

(m_0 , q_0 , G_0 (x,s))

So we can use this PDE no matter if the theory is non-renormalizable or not to extract finite values, for several quantities as mass charge and so on.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you have to realize that these so called "beta functions" are usually calculated by perturbative methods.and you cannot trust your perturbation theory if your expansion parameter becomes large.they generally yield "asymptotic series".Now the point is that to what scales you can trust a solution generated from an eqn derived from pertubation theory. usually, as it happens, for non-renormalisable theories, the couplings et al blow up at large energy scales. but it is my guess that if you are working at low energy scales, as in an effective theory, you can still do that!
 
And how is this derived ??..i mean the renormalization group equation..and why can't be applied to NOn-renormalizable theories??, i have tried reading the Wikipedia article but it's rather 'fuzzy' without explaining they impose the condition:

\frac{d Z[\Lambda]}{d\Lambda}=0

after introducing a momentum cut-off so p \le \Lambda and introducing a misterious function R_{\Lambda}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K