Renormalization of scalar field theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the renormalization of scalar field theory, specifically focusing on the ##\phi^4## theory and the treatment of the 2-point function ##\Gamma^{(2)}(p)##. Participants explore the implications of adding counterterms to the Lagrangian and the resulting effects on propagators and mass terms.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions the addition of a counterterm to the Lagrangian to renormalize the 2-point function, questioning how this leads to a specific propagator correction.
  • Another participant clarifies that the propagator correction arises from calculating the "one-loop tadpole diagram" for the self-energy of the boson using dimensional regularization.
  • A different participant speculates about the relationship between the counterterm and the propagator, suggesting that it might modify the mass term in a specific way.
  • One participant confirms that the counterterm contributes an additive divergent constant to the mass term and explains the role of the minimal subtraction scheme in handling divergences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the derivation of the propagator correction from the Lagrangian, with some focusing on the role of diagrams and others on the implications for mass terms. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact relationship between the counterterm and the propagator correction.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the calculations involved in deriving the propagator correction and the specific definitions of terms used in the context of renormalization.

Wledig
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
I was reading about the renormalization of ##\phi^4## theory and it was mentioned that in order to renormalize the 2-point function ##\Gamma^{(2)}(p)## we add the counterterm :

\delta \mathcal{L}_1 = -\dfrac{gm^2}{32\pi \epsilon^2}\phi^2

to the Lagrangian, which should give rise to a propagator term of the form:

-\dfrac{igm^2}{16\pi^2 \epsilon}

that will cancel the divergent term in ##\Gamma^{(2)}(p)##. My problem is with the expression above, it's unclear to me how to reach this propagator correction just from the Lagrangian. How can this be achieved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't get it directly from the Lagrangian but by calculating the "one-loop tadpole diagram" for the self-energy of the boson in dimensional regularization. For a detailed treatment, see

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wledig
I haven't done the calculations, but wouldn't that term give rise to a propagator as the one in the mass term?
\frac{i}{p^2 - \mu^2 }
But with \mu^2 = m^2 - \frac{gm^2}{32\pi^2 \epsilon}
?
 
Yes, it's a constant term (because it's a one-point function). It's a self-energy diagram, i.e., it just contributes an additive divergent constant contributing to the mass (squared) term, i.e., you have to add a counter term to the Lagrangian. The minimal subtraction scheme just subtracts the divergent piece ##\propto 1/\epsilon##. The physical mass of the particle is given by the pole of the propagator, ##G=1/(p^2-m^2-\Sigma)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChrisVer

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K